Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
News Feeds

Transcript in Couric “Message” About Fraudulent Film Was Edited Too

Recommended Posts

Katie Couric, the third rate reporter, who has been largely forgotten, should be ashamed of herself for the fraudulent editing of her doc.


— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump)



I just got off the phone with Philip Van Cleave of the Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL). The VCDL is the group apparently libeled via fraudulent editing in Katie Couric’s Under the Gun, a rabidly anti-gun film.


The film’s director, Stephanie Soechtig, was caught replacing a detailed, more than four-minute answer by three VCDL members to an obvious gun control question with eight seconds of VCDL members during a break taken during more than two hours of filming. The obvious intent of such an edit was to fraudulently make it appear that Couric’s question had stumped the group of gun rights supporters. In reality, the audio tape Van Cleave made of the exchange showed that the VCDL offered a multi-layered, well-reasoned response.


A bemused Van Cleave noted that in Couric’s recently published, semi-hidden apology on the Under the Gun web site (the cryptically linked “Message from Katie”), the transcript offered by Couric cut out the full VCDL response yet again.



Director Stephanie Soechtig and Producer/Yahoo!News Anchor Katie Couric were caught red-handed fabricating gun owner responses in the anti-gun propaganda film, Under the Gun.




According the the partial transcript Couric included in her “message,” the segment ended here.


FEMALE: I would take another outlook on this. First, I’ll ask you what crime or what law has ever stopped a crime? Tell me one law that has ever stopped a crime from happening.


Van Cleave noted that this partial transcript stops just 1:45 into a segment. The full conversation about this topic is actually 4:45 long. Couric once again cut VCDL three full minutes short.


You can listen to the entire segment here.



Why did Couric not provide the actual, full transcript from this segment of the interview? Why did Couric stop the transcript at a point that it sounds like a disjointed response instead of a rhetorical question designed to further the conversation?


Those and other questions may be among those Couric may have to answer under oath.


VCDL is weighing their legal options to having their response being fraudulently represented in the film, including a possible libel case.


The post Transcript in Couric “Message” About Fraudulent Film Was Edited Too appeared first on Bearing Arms.


Continue reading...

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

Who we are

We are concerned patriots who are not confident in the direction of our society. In order to protect the constitution and our way of life, we decided to build a website that will unite people like us with militias and militias with people like us, in doing so we have created the #1 militia community online.


Everything you read here is user-generated and may be of an unmoderated nature. The views and opinions expressed within do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the staff and management of MyMilitia.com.

Important Information

Your Privacy Is Important To Us Learn More: Privacy Policy