Jump to content

Intelligence Officers (S-2)

Recommended Posts

Last night, I ran into someone who professed to be his militia's Intelligence Officer. While he didn't go into what that meant for the modern militia movement. I am asking those of us who have such roles in our particular units or have served as an Intel person previously and have ideas of how to use that in the militia movement, what does or should the Intel officer do?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Our state Intel Officer is a retired Army Intel Warrant, crazy scary smart fella. His primary purpose is to serve as the organizational subject matter expert in all things dealing with security and intelligence. He also identifies and evaluates current and emerging threats not only at the national level, the region surrounding the state, but also within the state as well. He's additionally responsible for training not only leadership but all members in threat assessment at the local and wider area, basic intelligence gathering, analysis (including trending) and dissemination, He also severs as the "friendly reminder" that OPSEC and INFOSEC is paramount in the org.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a touchy one. Given that there are some groups that don't screen their applicants as well as others and groups working together on a larger whole can be problematic at best I would venture to keep this job to a unit specific task. I've been directly involved in things like this and can say with certainty that anything over one group can spell trouble. I.E. During the Sugar Pine mine incident I was involved with the S-2 and the initial planning. No matter how many times it was said,"This doesn't leave this room", or "Eyes only", somebody who wasn't involved would post something on Facebook or on a forum. This snow balled to the point that that asshat Blaine Cooper was posting daily B.S. updates from the mine that he wasn't even allowed on. This also goes along with piss poor leaders giving B.S. info as well. I had some guys there and one of the self proclaimed "bosses" tried saying there where black helicopters and to shoot them down.

This was documented to every person there as gospel and no questions were asked or allowed.

My point being that a smaller approach to having each group have their own S-2 that can call B.S. on something a more Alex Jones following group might claim would avoid dragging more level headed groups down the proverbial shit tube with them.

Also if in fact a larger operation takes off and these group end up working together you now have several S-2 personnel to work on all the incoming Intel. This would help verify the reports of space alien lizardmen FEMA shock troops coming to harvest our mountain house spaghetti. This could also help with spotting provocateur type groups who use the word "patriot" as a cover for more hateful objectives.

Just my two sense on this. After all the shenanigans here in Oregon our group and a couple other ones have adopted this approach to stay afloat on the bullshit.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Six, good point. One thing we don't tolerate is the posting of conspiracy theory stuff on either our FB page or in our forums. We tell folks there's plenty of places elsewhere for that kind of stuff. It detracts from the organizational mission focus and basically is a waste of time and effort. We use a pretty simple set of rules when it comes to intel reporting:

1. If you yourself saw it send it up in a SALUTE report.

2. If the information was given to you by secondhand it MUST have some form of physical evidence that it is or has occurred, if it is then send up a SALUTE report. Anything beyond secondhand is trash until confirmed by at least one person removed from the reporter with evidence, and no further.


We grade our intel using the following metrics:

















The rating of source/info is pretty handy during MDMP.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Author of the topic Posted

@SPECTRE 6 I definitely get that! Once I find those who can't keep their traps shut, I tend to have fun at their expense. What I'm primarily thinking of here, is what are the duties involved in being the S-2? When I served, we had a giant check list of individual, team and unit level tasks we were supposed to know how to accomplish. Could that be made to reflect how militias can use Intel Officers?


The primary focus being on unit S-2s, not on intelligence specialists. Larger task forces forming intel cells are, I think, more suitable to a different discussion.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly we don't have the luxury of having a formal school to train folks to serve S2 functions, and other than reading manuals and taking courses unless you get someone with .mil or LEO experience expectations probably have to be managed. I would think at a minimum a "unit intelligence officer" regardless of the size of the unit should be able to accomplish at least the following tasks:


- Planning and managing collection efforts along with the developing the R&S plan

- Processing and correlating information and intelligence from all sources

- Processing and disseminating intelligence information

- Preparing intelligence summaries and reports

- Conducts continuing evaluation of the unit's INFOSEC and OPSEC posture

- Identifying friendly and threat vulnerabilities

- Analyze terrain & weather

- Evaluate a threat and develop a simple OOB (Order of Battle)

- Plan EPW processing guidelines

- Recommend priority and routine intelligence requirements


Not a lot of tasks but there's a LOT of activity involved with those.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, which is why we were luckier than hell in getting a retired Army Intel warrant. IMHO this is an area where ya could fill it with an older or broke person that isn't exactly door kicker material but has a good level head and analytical mind.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Role of Intelligence in Small Tactical Teams





What is Intelligence

Intelligence, in the context of this discussion, is the act of reducing uncertainty. For militias, neighborhood protection teams, mutual assistance groups and other small groups, intelligence is crucial in economy of effort.


"Economy of effort" is essentially "getting the most bang for your buck."

Imagine the mission of: “Protect your home from looters after the storm”. Without any information, you don’t know where to focus observation, what to plan for, etc…. As we develop intelligence, we can reduce uncertainty, and better defend your home. If you know that the most likely looters will be young disenfranchised Swedish immigrants from the housing projects north of your neighborhood, you can be aware of what to look for. If you know the terrain of your area, then you can determine that the Swedish looters will come from one or two avenues of approach. This allows you to focus your observation there. Etc…






While in “peacetime” or “DEFCON 4”, or “condition blue”, or whatever the operative term for “No immediate operations or threats,” there are a number of intelligence functions that should be carried out to be prepared for operations.


Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield

One of the first tasks an intelligence section should carry out is Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield (or IPB)

In IPB, you determine the area of operations (AO), area of interest (AI), Map terrain features and determine lanes of movement, and avenues of approach. Where are obstacles, etc…


Sam Culper has an Amazon ebook (more like a pamphlet) on Amazon, called “intelligence preparation of the battlefield”, as well as his book “SHTF Intelligence” and website https://readfomag.com/ that goes into much more depth.




There is also the army field manual 34-130 Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield.


Other tasks that go with the IPB phase include defining the human terrain(Demographics, and where are people based on culture, economics, politics, etc), mapping infrastructure such as rail lines, power lines, gas lines, substations, pumping stations, water treatment, etc, and if your group has a capable signals section, mapping radio users, towers, frequencies, modes, etc.


Intelligence Database

In addition to IPB, your intelligence section should be developing an intelligence database.


In times past, filing cabinets, folders and index cards were the tool of choice. These days the most popular setup is a “wiki” type database. (Wikipedia is the most well known wiki) In fact, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security uses a “wiki” database called “Intelliwiki” as their national set-up. Regardless of what format you use, you should be collecting information on influences in your AO.


Categories of influences are people, groups, gangs, organizations, companies, etc… Gaining thorough information on these influences helps to reduce uncertainty.


For example, knowing that Ludvig Karlsson is the leader of the local Swedish criminal gang, means that an intelligence section can keep tabs on him, to get an idea of gang activities, instead of trying to watch the whole gang. (An example of “economy of effort”)


Operational Planning

Peacetime has ended, or you have gone to” DEFCON 3”, or “Condition Orange”, or whatever your group determines to be a heightened state of readiness. This elevation of readiness does not happen in a vacuum, it happens in response to something, and that “something” should help to define your intelligence requirements. Your group is going operational. At this point the intelligence section will start doing analysis, and in conjunction with leadership, determine priority intelligence requirements, (PIR’s), data gaps that need to be filled, developing human intelligence resources (aka spies and moles) within groups that you may have interest in, etc…


The who and what of this planning it this stage will be very dependent on your groups function and goals. A neighborhood protection team will be more interested in criminal gangs, and food supply, while a guerrilla/insurgent group will be more concerned with political groups and influences.



Analysis is the process of taking known information about situations and entities of strategic, operational, or tactical importance, characterizing the known, and, with appropriate statements of probability, the future actions in those situations and by those entities.


An excellent book to get started in understanding analysis is: Intelligence Analysis, a Target-Centric Approach


Whole college courses are taught on analysis, and this discussion can not possibly cover all the information needed just to get started.


To briefly encapsulate the analysis process, what is known, and what is reported is evaluated to rate the reliability of the data, then that information is modeled, with the different possible outcomes of actions. Most likely course of action and most dangerous course of action are considered. “Wargaming” and “Red Teaming” may be used to play out COA’s,



Once your group is actually conducting a mission, or operational, the duties of the intelligence section get added to. The most common responsibilities include tracking friendly forces, enemy forces, other groups, weather, looking for trigger events, and any changes in the assumptions that were made in the analysis and planning phase, and advising leadership on any changes in expected COA’s. Just because you are operational does not mean the planning, and pre-planning stop. In fact it is when things are most fluid that keeping IPB’s, Intel DB’s, and models up to date can be the biggest help.







Putting it all together

Example 1: Neighborhood Protection Team

Background. Due to some un-named catastrophe, there is a break down in the rule of law. Government is non-functional, and your group is tasked with protecting the neighborhood from looters. You have done IPB, and built an intelligence database.


Defense of your location is the mission, so you develop some of the following PIR’s


Who are the most likely threats, and what are their capabilities and methods?


What is an indicator that a threat is imminent?





Because you have developed your intelligence database, you know that there are two criminal gangs that were functional during peacetime in your area.

The Swedish gang is the biggest, and their leader, Ludvig Karlsson drives a tricked out red Volvo SUV.

There is also a latino gang ran by someone called “El Hefe”. Many gang members have low-rider cars and compact pickups.



Because you have done a proper IPB, you know that there is only vehicle access to your neighborhood via 2 roads from the north. Travel on foot from the west is unlikely due to the swampy marsh on that side, and thick woods followed by another neighborhood to the south means that threat to you from that direction is unlikely without the southern neighborhood being attacked first. This knowledge allows to more economically marshal your resources to guard the two roads, and the exposed fields on the east. (This economy of effort, and you don’t totally discount the south and west, but you can devote significantly fewer resources to guarding them.)


A week into the catastrophe, you get a reliable report that a neighborhood 12 miles to the north of you was wiped out. The attackers are reported to have been Caucasian, and many were blond. A red tricked out Volvo SUV was seen. There were about 30 attackers. And they attacked around noon. They raped and looted, and killed everyone that was in the neighborhood, and then set it on fire.


A few days later a reliable report indicates that another neighborhood was attacked at night by about a dozen Hispanic looking men. They only looted, but did not hesitate to kill any who resisted. A low-rider pickup truck was cruising the area that afternoon.


A few days later, there is another report of a daylight raid and red Volvo SUV on one neighborhood that was burnt to the ground, and a night time raid by a Latino gang that happened after a low-rider pickup was seen in the area.


At this point we can “model” the behavior of the two gangs, and say that the most likely course of action by the Latino gang will involve a scout in a low rider pickup, and attack at night, while an attack by the Swedish gang will include a red Volvo SUV during the day.


We then determine that the most dangerous course of action (for us) is to be attacked by the Swedish gang, since they spare none, and burn everything to the ground. Being attacked by the Latino gang is also a dangerous course of action.


Knowing this we have a number of courses of action to consider, in order to make our plans.


Since you know that El Hefe is the leader of the Latino gang, you could specifically target him at his home (If you know where that is), but what will the gang do then? Will they escalate their violence? Is there a second in command that will step up and carry out the same raids? Or will they fall apart?

It is okay to say “I don’t know.” In fact it is preferred. Guessing or making stuff up is a recipe for disaster. A proper analysis needs the facts and data weighted correctly to be useful.



Not knowing what will happen to the Latino gang if El Hefe is taken out leads leadership to conclude it is not worth the risk of sending people out of the protection of the neighborhood to make the hit. Instead, they conclude that an advanced observation post (OP) to watch for low-riders, and red Volvos is a better risk/reward.


Several weeks in, your OP radios in that a tricked out red Volvo SUV, followed by about nine other cars just passed the OP en route to your neighborhood, about six miles away. You sound the alarm, and your neighborhood protection team moves to a prepared ambush site one mile north of the neighborhood. When the Volvo convoy gets into the killzone, the ambush is executed.


After most of the convoy is wiped out, you find Ludvig Karlsson and some other Swedish gang members among the dead and injured, along with a number of weapons, molotov cocktails, and forced entry tools. Mission success (for now)


Even with the one threat eliminated, the Intel team cannot stand down. Will the Latino gang attack? Will another group move in, or fill the void left by the Swedish gang? Will any survivors of the Swedish gang try to retaliate? (Will they even know who wiped them out, since the ambush was away from the neighborhood?) These are all issues the intelligence section must continue to work on.





Now imagine if the neighborhood protection team did not have an intelligence section or person?

The first hint of a raid would be when the raid happens. Most likely the neighborhood would have more casualties. They would not have the advantage of a well planned ambush, or early warning. Vehicles and houses would be damaged by the firefight. If molotovs are thrown, some houses may burn. If the defenders do not completely wipe out the Swedish gang, and they are driven back, they may come back for retribution. All a much more dangerous course of action.





Example 2: Intel in political action

Background: Your group is a state gun rights group trying to influence social and political action to remove current state firearms restrictions.


Your IPB will not focus on physical terrain, lanes of movement and avenues of approach, but instead focus on the human terrain. Where are the conservative and liberal neighborhoods? What areas of employment tend to have one political stripe work there? (For instance more liberals will work in the trendy hipster coffee shop section of town, while more conservative minded folks will be working in the industrial business park. ) Why does this matter? If you spend money on political advertising such as a billboard, putting one that resonates with conservatives in a conservative part of town is more effective than putting a conservative billboard in a liberal part of town.


Your database will have the politicians, their donors, businesses, and donor businesses. Other political activist groups (Both for and against), etc… This is used to leverage campaigns against the opponents donors and sponsors. A boycott of a gun grabbers major donor, may hurt their bottom line, and reduce their effectiveness.


Your analysis will focus on which groups to pressure, or what areas to market to will yield the biggest effect for political action. (Economy of effort again)





Example 3: Guerrilla / Insurgency

Background: You live in Dirka Dirka-stan, and due to the fact that the political establishment is so entrenched and in bed with big business, your attempts to peacefully effect the political process have failed, so your group decides to go kinetic.


Understanding the human terrain is essential!


There is a senator from Dirkafornia that is notoriously anti-rights and anti-gun. A lot of insurgents, if given the chance, would jump at the opportunity to kinetically remove the senator. However, if your intelligence section has done its homework, they may conclude that since the senator is from the city of Dirkfrancisco, that their likely successor will be just as bad as a gun grabber as the target. Additionally, we can model that after many political assassinations, there is a groundswell of sympathetic support for the deceased’s pet causes… so a kinetic action against the senator may actually produce the opposite of the desired effect, and get sympathy votes of “We should ban more guns, because that is what the senator would have wanted, in honor of them.”





Individual guerrilla actions may require an IPB for a specific action, such as an ambush or assasination.

Analysis is needed to look at the courses of action for success and failures of the mission so that the risks can be weighed. What are the third and fourth order effects? Will there be blowback? By whom? What will the public reaction be?






Intelligence is an important task for small tactical teams. It can mean the difference between success or failure. It can prevent the waste of life and resources. It drives the missions!


In an Army Infantry Brigade there is an intelligence company of about 60 people devoted to the task, which include network and computer technicians, Human Intelligence collectors, Signals Intelligence collectors, exploitation teams, analysts, synchronization and collection management sections, linguists, cryptanalysts, imagery analysts, database technicians, and more.

Additionally this company supports intelligence sections at brigade and battalion level.


This is a huge role to fill by one or couple of people that will make a small teams intelligence section. While you can not do everything a brigade intel company does, starting with the basics gets you a huge advantage over the unprepared.





For more links check the S2 library section here:


Citizenmilitem.com S2 library


From http://citizenmilitem.com/?p=289




Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be leary of anyone proclaiming a Intel or anything in a milita. Far to many fake special forced wannabes.


Intel is a group effort and I can't see groups begin effective with more then 20 people.

“If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn’t thinking.” – General George S. Patton

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Author of the topic Posted

It takes experience to be able to identify someone with an intelligence background. Its no Jason Bourne, but it is useful. Even in a rudimentary fashion of squad level knowing your immediate area.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Who Viewed the Topic

    3 members have viewed this topic:
  • Create New...