Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

BREAKING: ATF Reverses Position on SB Tactical’s Pistol Stabilizing Brace

Recommended Posts

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) Tuesday reversed its decision and issued a letter stating that shouldering the SB Tactical pistol stabilizing brace does not constitute a “redesign” and thus would not be regulated under the umbrella of the NFA.



For some context, let’s go back to 2012. That’s when USMC and Army vet Alex Bosco first developed the first pistol stabilizing arm brace. After testing it with disabled veterans — the group it was initially made for — Bosco sought approval for his design from the ATF. He received a letter back that said, in part, that “the submitted brace, when attached to a firearm, does not convert that weapon to be fired from the shoulder and would not alter the classification of a pistol or other firearm. While a firearm so equipped would still be regulated by the Gun Control Act … such a firearm would not be subject to NFA controls.”


That was all well and good, and Bosco co-founded SB Tactical and — in partnership with Sig Sauer and Century Arms — brought the first pistol stabilizing arm braces to market in the spring of 2013.


In 2014, Sergeant Joe Bradley of the Greenwood Police Department in Colorado wrote to the ATF asking whether or not firing an AR pistol from the shoulder using a product like SB Tactical’s brace would cause the weapon to be reclassified as a short-barreled rifle (SBR).


The ATF said it wouldn’t, writing “for the following reasons, we have determined that firing a pistol from the shoulder would not cause the pistol to be reclassified as an SBR: FTB classifies weapons based on their physical design characteristics. While usage/functionality of the weapon does influence the intended design, it is not the sole criterion for determining the classification of a weapon. Generally speaking, we do not classify weapons based on how an individual uses a weapon.”


Then in January 2015, the ATF issued an open letter right before SHOT Show reversing its stance. The letter said in part that “the pistol stabilizing brace was neither ‘designed’ nor approved to be used as a shoulder stock, and therefore use as a shoulder stock constitutes a ‘redesign’ of the device because a possessor has changed the very function of the item.”



Now the pendulum has swung back the other way as SB Tactical has received a clarification letter from the ATF, the upshot of which is that shouldering the company’s pistol stabilizing brace doesn’t constitute a redesign. Here’s the most important part of the letter:


With respect to stabilizing braces, ATF has concluded that attaching the brace to a handgun as a forearm brace does not “make” a short-barreled rifle because in the configuration as submitted to and approved by FATD, it is not intended to be and cannot comfortably be fired from the shoulder. If, however, the shooter/possessor takes affirmative steps to configure the device for use as a shoulder-stock — for example, configuring the brace so as to permanently affix it to the end of a buffer tube, (thereby creating a length that has no other purpose than to facilitate its use as a stock), removing the arm-strap, or otherwise undermining its ability to be used as a brace — and then in fact shoots the firearm from the shoulder using the accessory as a shoulder stock, that person has objectively “redesigned” the firearm for the purposes of the NFA.


Basically, if an SB Tactical pistol stabilizing brace is attached by the end user to an AR pistol buffer tube, it can legally be shouldered and fired without being considered an SBR under the NFA.


If, however, you “permanently affix it” to the end of the buffer tube, remove the arm strap or make any other alterations and fire it from your shoulder, it’s now an SBR.


As The Truth About Guns points out, the ATF’s letter doesn’t apply to all braces, but rather only to pistol braces that have been submitted to the ATF’s FTB (Firearms Technology Branch) and gotten approval. So far, SB Tactical is the only company to have received that approval.


Bottom line: Don’t shoulder your brace if it’s not made by SB Tactical.


The post BREAKING: ATF Reverses Position on SB Tactical’s Pistol Stabilizing Brace appeared first on Tactical Life Gun Magazine: Gun News and Gun Reviews.


Original Source

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

Who we are

We are a community of concerned patriots who are not overly confident in the current direction of our society, from the wild political climate to what can be summed up as a lack of morals or a complete void of integrity and pretty much a blatant disregard of respect..... Respect for our past, respect for our future and respect for each other. In order to protect our constitution and life as we know it, we decided to not be the silent majority anymore and pull our selves up by the bootstraps and make the world a better place. This website is to unite people like us, people who want to make a difference ... and do it the right way, Little did we know that in doing so we would create the number one militia community online. Here we are. Enjoy.


We require all members to think before they post. We understand the issues raised on this site may lead to heated debate, but we still require all users to maintain a respectful environment. My Militia website bears no responsibility for the accuracy of anyone's comments and will bear no responsibility or legal liability for any discussion postings. We reserve the right to remove posts without notice, and the right to ban anyone who willfully violates the rules. All content is posted live with no moderation. If you see something that you think shouldn't be here please report it so we can handle it accordingly. Always respect the privacy of others if something is shared with you in a private fashion such as real names, emails or phone numbers. Please keep them private.

Important Information

Your Privacy Is Important To Us Learn More: Privacy Policy