Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Bearing Arms

Judge Reaches Decision In Katie Couric Anti-Gun Documentary Debacle

Recommended Posts



Back in September, Katie Couric was facing defamation charges for her anti-gun documentary, Under the Gun. The documentary was cut in a way that made the Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL) look as though they were unsure of their answers to Couric’s questions.


The lawsuit arose from one particular part of the documentary, where Couric poses the following question:


“If there are no background checks how do you prevent – I know you all are going to answer this, but I’m asking anyway – if there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from walking into say a licensed gun dealer and purchasing a gun?”


Her attorneys attempted to have the case thrown out but the lawsuit stuck.


A judge finally ruled in the case and found there were no harmful implications resulting in the editing.


U.S. District Court Judge John Gibney, Jr. dismissed the case, with the following written ruling:


The plaintiffs’ defamation claims fail because the interview scene is not false.
Under the Gun
portrays members of the VCDL not answering the question posed by Couric. In reality, members of the VCDL did not answer the question posed by Couric. They talked about background checks and gun laws generally, but did not answer the question of how to prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing guns without background checks. The editing simply dramatizes the sophistry of the VCDL members.


The first two alleged defamatory implications do not arise from the film,” he concludes. “The film does not suggest that they do not have a basis to oppose background checks or are ignorant about gun regulations and rights. Rather, the film makes a different point about the effect of existing regulations on how to keep guns out of the wrong hands.


Not having an answer to a specific question about effective alternatives to background checks does not imply anything about fitness to own a gun store and to sell guns,” responds the judge. “Webb argues that the footage falsely conveys that ‘she lacks knowledge regarding integral aspects of her business,’ specifically, knowledge about ‘background checks and the rights of individuals to purchase firearms.’ This argument fails because it seeks to introduce new matter, which innuendo in the defamation context cannot do. Couric did not ask ‘Under the current law, can felons purchase firearms?’ Falsely stating that Webb did not have an answer to that question would certainly imply unfitness in her trade. This, however, was not Couric’s question.


The judge’s full opinion can be found here.


It appears Couric’s ‘under the gun’ is above the law.


The post Judge Reaches Decision In Katie Couric Anti-Gun Documentary Debacle appeared first on Bearing Arms.


Original Source

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

Who we are

We are concerned patriots who are not confident in the direction of our society. In order to protect the constitution and our way of life, we decided to build a website that will unite people like us with militias and militias with people like us, in doing so we have created the #1 militia community online.


Everything you read here is user-generated and may be of an unmoderated nature. The views and opinions expressed within do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the staff and management of MyMilitia.com.

Important Information

Your Privacy Is Important To Us Learn More: Privacy Policy