Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Bearing Arms

Magical thinking typifies the left’s approach to Parkland, and the 2nd

Recommended Posts

One of the issues with the modern left — which encompasses the #marchforourlives crowd is the tendency to confer moral authority upon anyone who A. is a “victim” and/or B. speaks passionately.

It is obviously a logical fallacy to assume that simply because someone who has been victimized or shows emotion on a subject has somehow become morally superior to everyone around them.

David Hogg and his crew are passionate, they’re young, it comes with the territory.

As Tucker Carlson points out, they’re jumping to extremes.

“I agree with that this is a kid who saw unspeakable tragedy, he saw his classmates killed, and that’s exactly why he shouldn’t be involved in formulating a response to it. He is a kid. So you can’t simultaneously argue that you need to shut up and listen to him and if you don’t you are bad, which is what the left is arguing, and that we shouldn’t take what he says seriously or literally,” he continued. “You have to choose one. I’m happy to choose the first one.”

Note well, Hogg and his friends are not appealing to facts or logic. Few if any of the proposals they advocate would have stopped any of the recent shooters except perhaps the Parkland shooter.

But they’re not appealing to logic, they’re appealing to emotion, which to the left means they must be right.

As an example, Emma Gonzales, another survivor of the Parkland shooting over at CNN:

I don’t think the FBI is to blame. They did mess up, that’s true. And the fact that they’re owning up to is an incredible step in the right direction. No other politicians are owning up to the fact that they’ve made mistakes not putting forward anti-gun lobbies and I don’t really care what people who defend the Second Amendment have to say.

Despite the verifiable screwups from top to bottom in this case.

Which leads to the other part of the problem, the left tends to conflate eloquence with intellectual rigor.

The Parkland kids are bright, they speak well, at least when they’re not dropping F-bombs, therefore they must be experts.

In reality of course, they’re nothing of the sort.

As Tucker said, they’ve survived something horrific, and that bears noting. But simply being a victim does not make you an expert on anything.

This is part and parcel of the magical thinking that typifies the gun grabbers — and modern liberalism.

Against all logic and against all common sense, they think that more gun laws will fix it this time for sure despite it never having worked in the past.

Moreover, the media has gone out of their way to deify these kids, imbuing them with a cachet their expertise does not warrant while simultaneously ignoring  a student walkout in favor of the Second Amendment. And more particularly giving almost no air time to fellow Parkland survivor Kyle Kashuv who vehemently disagrees with Mr. Hogg, or attacking him as CNN’s Joan Walsh did in the previous link — the same thing for which conservative commentator Laura Ingraham was pilloried for.

Logic, truth, common sense, these things do not matter to the left, it’s all about feelings, which are all too easy to exploit in the wake of a tragedy — as we have seen all too often.

The post Magical thinking typifies the left’s approach to Parkland, and the 2nd appeared first on Bearing Arms.

View the full article

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  


Important Information

Your Privacy Is Important To Us Learn More: Privacy Policy