Jump to content
Bearing Arms

Army Picks Sig Optic For Designated Marksman Rifles

Recommended Posts

Army-Marksmanship.jpg

The United States Army seems to be constantly looking for ways to improve its designated marksmen. Different from snipers, designated marksmen provide precision shooting to the infantry unit that can be available whenever they need it, but still be effective in other battlefield conditions. It’s a solid concept, and the Army is continually looking to make it better.

Now, it seems it’s looking at Sig Sauer to help. In particular, it’s gone with Sig for optics.

Earlier this year, the Army conducted a Limited User Evaluation of the Squad Designated Marksman Rifle. Based on the M110A1 Compact Semi Automatic Sniper System program, SDMR consists of a 7.62 NATO G28 rifle built by Heckler & Koch, equipped with an OSS Suppressor and Harris Bipod. The missing piece was the optic.

The Army’s Program Manager for Soldier Weapons invited industry, through the Tailored Logistics Support program, to submit 1-6x variable optics for the evaluation. They selected the SIG Optics TANGO6 1-6x Optic. It is a front focal optic and may recall that we previously covered this scope during Enforce Tac. Please note that this is not the mount which will be used on SDMR.

This optic was chosen specifically for the SDMR and as of now, the Directed Requirement is 6,069 systems. Funding is set for FY19.

The TANGO6 isn’t exactly an inexpensive optic, but that’s not surprising. Anything that can meet the military’s standards has a tendency to be a little on the expensive side, at least at first.

This is more good news for Sig, who is already enjoying healthy contracts for the M17/M18 Modular Handgun Systems. The company is also having some growing pains, apparently, but it’s likely that Sig will get those cleaned up soon enough.

In the meantime, this means big money for Sig.

As I’ve noted before, military contracts tend to be lucrative in and of themselves, but those contracts also serve as a signal to many others that this is the product it wants. Plenty of people want all the bells and whistles the guys in the field have, even if they’re not necessarily the best bells and whistles.

I’m not saying this optic is bad. I’m not saying it’s good. I have absolutely no experience with it, so I’m not commenting on the quality. What I am saying is that there are a lot of people who will buy what the military buys, which makes military contracts even more financially advantageous than the number on the contract might indicate. That’s all.

Sig is going to do well with its optics division based on this one contract alone.

Frankly, more power to them. It won the contract, so it deserves what follows afterward, and from conversations with those who have Sig optics, the Army could do far, far worse as far as glass for its designated marksmen. As far as I’m concerned, anything that helps bring our troops home safe and sound while not allowing the enemy the same is a win.

We’ll have to see how these shake out after they’re deployed, but I’m confident there shouldn’t be any major problems.

The post Army Picks Sig Optic For Designated Marksman Rifles appeared first on Bearing Arms.

View the full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I feel any soldier who's gonna go and use his weapon needs the option of optics up to them and caliber witch in some cases they can pick but I think I'm all cases they should pick i straight up wouldn't carry the m45 I opted for a glock 19 and I think there should be more options not that anyone cares it just makes more  sense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I get what you mean but come on they can figure it out it's like being stuck on the ground in a 30 yrs gun fight and soldiers gotta use what they have issues to them for the most part.it mys well be a weapon they wanna function you get alot more outta of that then you might think.

Edited by Ripcannon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

Your Privacy Is Important To Us Learn More: Privacy Policy