The US Army Is Looking for M240 Machine Gun Manufacturers

[Tactical-Life 254]

U.S. Army Contracting Command New Jersey has issued a sources sought notice looking for companies capable of building the M40 machine gun.

RELATED STORY

Full-Auto Shootout: Comparing the RPD & RPK Light Machine Guns

The notice, which was posted to FedBizOpps last month, explicitly states that this is not a RFP or a solicitation. Rather, the service is simply conducting “market research” as it moves to identify companies that have an interest in making and delivering the M40 coax, B, C, D, H and L variants, as well as spare parts. The result of this “market research” will determine the method of procurement, “if a requirement materializes,” the notices says.

M240 Primer

Here’s the background on the M240, as outlined in the notice:

The M240 Machine Gun is a gas-operated, air-cooled, belt-fed 7.62mm weapon that fires NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) standard ammunition from an open bolt position. Each variant has specific features such as a folding bipod (M240B, M240H), quick change barrel assembly with integral carrying handle gas system, feed cover, bolt assembly (which allows closing of the cover regardless of bolt position), spade grip assembly (M240D, M240H), collapsible buttstock (M240B), integral optical sight rail, and forward rails (M240B, M240H). The M240L features a titanium receiver, redesigned barrel assembly with re-contoured outer dimensions, titanium carrying handle, and lighter weight gas housing; and pistol grip/trigger frame assembly composed of a metal/polymer hybrid.

The Army adds that it wants companies capable of “fabrication, inspection testing, First Article Testing, and delivery” of the M240. Technical specs will not be made available, the service says. Responses should include the following:

Response Requirements

1. Capabilities in manufacturing belt fed, automatic weapons.

2. Experience in manufacturing other military small arms weapons.

3. Experience with fabrication techniques including: investment castings, steel forgings, machining from billet stock (steel) with tolerances as tight as 1/1000 of an inch (or higher), riveting parts to assembly dimensions as tight as 1/1000 of an inch (or higher), heat treating capabilities (including induction hardening, through hardening, stress relieving), and final protective finish capabilities (including chrome, phosphate).

4. Description of facilities/equipment to include testing ranges (minimum 100m in length) with instrumentation (bullet velocity, dispersion, and yaw as well as weapon rate of fire), and physical security for weapons and ammunition storage (including Defense Security System (DDS) approval).

5. Confirmation of possession of a valid Federal Firearms license to manufacture destructive devices.

6. Registration with the State Department under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).

7. Inspection capability to include compliance with International Standards Organization (ISO) 9001:2008 or equivalent.

8. Confirmation of established configuration management procedure to include protecting proprietary technical data.

9. Experience with weapon serialization to include control and application of Item Unique Identification (IUID) markings.

10. Personnel’s past experience.

11. Current production capacity per month.

Responses were due on July 6, which means a slate of companies likely already reached out.

To read the notice in full, visit FBO.gov.

The post The US Army Is Looking for M240 Machine Gun Manufacturers appeared first on Tactical Life Gun Magazine: Gun News and Gun Reviews.

View the full article

[LetFreedomRing 5,763]

It will be interesting to find out which companies applied and get the contracts.  

[Skillet 1,735]

Given the requirements I'm willing to bet that FN USA is about the only company with the current capability to meet it with any amount of economy. There are some great smaller companies out there but I don't think they'd be able to keep up with the .gov demand at a price that a major manufacturer can. You can probably count GD out of it as they are focusing on the LWMMG