Jump to content
Bearing Arms

Police Groups Oppose Washington Anti-Gun Initiative

Recommended Posts


Washington state is in the midst of the most screwed up battle on a gun control initiative I’ve ever seen. Initiative 1639 was thrown out by the courts, then that was overturned, and now the state is going to have to vote on this come November.

However, while anti-gunners routinely claim that measures like those proposed in Initiative 1639 will reduce crime, this particular set of laws has gathered opposition from the one group you would think would support something that would result in less crime: Police officers.

The Washington State Sheriffs Association, the Washington State Law Enforcement Firearms Instructor Association, and the Washington Council of Police & Sheriffs announced they oppose I-1639, a move to make it harder to get some semi-automatic firearms.

The groups argued, in statements released by the National Rifle Association, that the ballot measure will have little effect on crime while ramping up possibly unconstitutional restrictions on gun owners.

“This initiative has nothing to do with ‘assault weapons’ and is directed only at our good citizens who already pass multiple background checks before owning a firearm,” said WSLEFIA. “I-1639 is an attack on civil rights and is an attempt to marginalize all firearm owners, including law enforcement officers. I-1639 will impair public safety, embolden criminals and impose burdensome restrictions on our most law-abiding citizens.”

Backed by the Alliance for Gun Responsibility — a group that was able to get two different gun control ballot measures passed since 2014 — the initiative aims to change the definition under Washington law of an “assault rifle” to effectively regulate all semi-auto long arms other than shotguns. The new requirements proposed alongside the definition would bar sales to those under 21 altogether.

Those seeking to purchase an AR-15 or similar firearm would have to pass an enhanced background check, show proof of training, pay up to a $25 fee, and wait at least 10 days before picking up the gun from a dealer. There would be no exception to those who already have a concealed carry permit or have legally purchased a rifle before.

To call the initiative controversial is understating the case.

It’s good to WSsLEFIA sees I-1639 for precisely what it is. What a lot of these anti-gunners forget is that police officers are often gun owners on their own. They’re the very people being demonized by their anti-gun rhetoric, so it’s not surprising they see through the bull.

Not only that, but they see the routine failures of gun control every single day. They see how laws that will supposedly stop bad people do nothing to them, but good people are inhibited from exercising their constitutional right without jumping through countless hoops.

It’s ridiculous, and the police officers often see that.

As a result, they’re stepping up to oppose the measures. I’m sure some small group of police officers will be found to lend support to the cause–probably a group of police chiefs, truth be told–and they’ll try to pretend the rank and file don’t matter, but that’s not how it works. Police chiefs are political appointees. They reflect the politics of those who hired them. The rank and file are the ones who see what works and what doesn’t on a daily basis.

Maybe it’s time for Washington state residents to listen to those guys for a change.

The post Police Groups Oppose Washington Anti-Gun Initiative appeared first on Bearing Arms.

View the full article

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Who Viewed the Topic

    4 members have viewed this topic:

Who we are

We are a community of concerned patriots who are not overly confident in the current direction of our society, from the wild political climate to what can be summed up as a lack of morals or a complete void of integrity and pretty much a blatant disregard of respect..... Respect for our past, respect for our future and respect for each other. In order to protect our constitution and life as we know it, we decided to not be the silent majority anymore and pull our selves up by the bootstraps and make the world a better place. This website is to unite people like us, people who want to make a difference ... and do it the right way, Little did we know that in doing so we would create the number one militia community online. Here we are. Enjoy.


We require all members to think before they post. We understand the issues raised on this site may lead to heated debate, but we still require all users to maintain a respectful environment. My Militia website bears no responsibility for the accuracy of anyone's comments and will bear no responsibility or legal liability for any discussion postings. We reserve the right to remove posts without notice, and the right to ban anyone who willfully violates the rules. All content is posted live with no moderation. If you see something that you think shouldn't be here please report it so we can handle it accordingly. Always respect the privacy of others if something is shared with you in a private fashion such as real names, emails or phone numbers. Please keep them private.
  • Create New...

Important Information

Your Privacy Is Important To Us Learn More: Privacy Policy