Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Bearing Arms

Delaware Judge Shoots Down Anti-Gun Regulations For Parks

Recommended Posts

59a3d8c9-1fff-4d50-aa50-96106c8bad81.jpg

Parks are places that most folks wouldn’t think of as being a battleground. I don’t mean a literal one, generally, but they are battlegrounds. I’ve seen plenty of battles fought over the right to keep and bear arms in various parks throughout the nation.

However, a Delaware judge just smacked down the state on its efforts to restrict guns in state parks.

DOVER, Del. (AP) – A Delaware judge on Thursday struck down some regulations on carrying guns in state parks and on state forest land, saying they are unconstitutional.

The ruling comes in a lawsuit by the Delaware State Sportsmen’s Association and other gun rights advocates challenging firearms regulations developed by the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, and the state Department of Agriculture.

The two agencies began developing the regulations after the Delaware Supreme Court ruled last year that a ban on non-hunting firearms in state parks and forests was unconstitutional.

Among other things, the regulations prohibit people from openly carrying firearms in certain designated “sensitive” areas of state parks and forests, such as offices and visitor centers, while exempting people with valid concealed carry permits from that prohibition.

On Thursday, Superior Court Judge Jeffrey Clark ruled that some of the regulations go too far, violating both the federal and state constitutions.

Clark sided with the plaintiffs in ruling that officials cannot prohibit visitors from carrying guns in camping areas in parks and lodges on forest land. He noted that the Supreme Court specifically held that a person has a constitutional right to have a firearm while camping overnight in a state park.

“The effect of including camp sites within sensitive areas forces state park and forest visitors to give up their right to self-defense in order to camp overnight in those areas,” Clark wrote.

For some reason, bureaucrats love to restrict gun ownership.

It’s probably because they know almost everyone hates them and they’re scared that if they allow people to carry guns, they’ll get shot. It’s not the risk many like to think, but if it makes them feel important, so be it.

But that doesn’t give them the right to actually do it.

I’ve said before that a law-abiding citizen could be trusted with a rocket launcher, and no one will ever be hurt because of his or her possession of it. But if a violent felon can get his hands on a rock, he’ll still be able to hurt or kill someone. In other words, there’s nothing to fear from law-abiding citizens being armed and everything to fear from even a disarmed violent thug.

That’s why I’m glad the judge smacked down these regulations. The law-abiding in Delaware have a right to protect themselves, and not just from two-legged predators. There are other things in state parks that might represent a threat. Possibly a more horrific threat. Anything from bears to rabid squirrels can haunt the forests. All of those can be a legitimate threat that warrants using a handgun in self-defense.

But it seems that some didn’t think that right.

Luckily, they’ve been overruled.

The post Delaware Judge Shoots Down Anti-Gun Regulations For Parks appeared first on Bearing Arms.

View the full article

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Who Viewed the Topic

    1 member has viewed this topic:
    Let_Freedom_Ring

Who we are

We are a community of concerned patriots who are not overly confident in the current direction of our society, from the wild political climate to what can be summed up as a lack of morals or a complete void of integrity and pretty much a blatant disregard of respect..... Respect for our past, respect for our future and respect for each other. In order to protect our constitution and life as we know it, we decided to not be the silent majority anymore and pull our selves up by the bootstraps and make the world a better place. This website is to unite people like us, people who want to make a difference ... and do it the right way, Little did we know that in doing so we would create the number one militia community online. Here we are. Enjoy.

Disclaimer

We require all members to think before they post. We understand the issues raised on this site may lead to heated debate, but we still require all users to maintain a respectful environment. My Militia website bears no responsibility for the accuracy of anyone's comments and will bear no responsibility or legal liability for any discussion postings. We reserve the right to remove posts without notice, and the right to ban anyone who willfully violates the rules. All content is posted live with no moderation. If you see something that you think shouldn't be here please report it so we can handle it accordingly. Always respect the privacy of others if something is shared with you in a private fashion such as real names, emails or phone numbers. Please keep them private.
×

Important Information

Your Privacy Is Important To Us Learn More: Privacy Policy