Jump to content
Bearing Arms

Project Veritas Takes Aim At Kyrsten Sinema’s Anti-Gun Views

Recommended Posts

2f789e4b-3b9b-4f87-999e-a6b27824e9b9.jpg

Democrats are desperate. As the midterm elections approach, they are desperate to take Congress. They can’t just take the House, either. They need the whole enchilada if they want a prayer in hell of doing any of the things they want to do, which is namely to try and force President Trump into enacting at least some of their agenda.

Key to that goal is obviously to take the Senate. If nothing else, taking the Senate gives them the power to force Trump’s hand in selecting judges or other appointees.

That means Democratic candidates for the Senate have to be careful. If they’re in red states, they can’t appear to be too radical. Otherwise, they’ll lose. Unfortunately for Kyrsten Sinema in Arizona, when it comes to guns, she has an agenda that’s not in line with Arizona’s pro-gun reputation.

You see, the folks at Project Veritas are at it again. This time, they infiltrated Sinema’s campaign.

Project Veritas Action Fund has released undercover video from current Congresswoman and US Senate candidate Kyrsten Sinema’s campaign, exposing the campaign’s belief that to win in Arizona, Sinema must appear more moderate than she really is, and hide her progressive views from voters in the process. This is the sixth undercover video report Project Veritas has released in a series revealing secrets and lies from political campaigns in 2018.

Said James O’Keefe, founder and president of Project Veritas Action:

“Kyrsten Sinema used to be quite the radical firebrand.  But now because she knows she must get moderate voters to win her senate race, she has perfected the art of playing it safe while diminishing her prior views and behavior.”

Arizonans will “actually shoot you”

Featured in this report is Sinema’s campaign manager Michelle Davidson, who explains that because of political pressures, Sinema cannot outright campaign on an assault weapons bans:

DAVIDSON: “… I think Kyrsten’s approach is so, I think, important. We can’t be talking about an assault weapons ban… “

In the video, Rep. Sinema says that Arizonans will “actually shoot you” if you support gun bans in an Arizona campaign. Davidson says that while Rep. Sinema can’t outwardly campaign on gun bans, what she can do is champion other gun control points:

DAVIDSON: “So we can’t talk about that [assault weapon bans] right? So what Kyrsten… the conversation that she can lead is how do we get to a place where we can, background checks… We’ve got to fix the gun show loophole, we have to fix the background check system. We’ve got to make it harder for people who have been convicted of domestic violence and other violent crimes to get guns—I mean those are the conversations we can have.”

Also featured in the report is Steve Andrews, a big donor to Sinema’s campaign for the Senate, who says that while not being able to campaign on assault weapon bans “voting I’d have to assume she’ll be okay.” Andrews adds “she won’t support assault weapons, I don’t think.”

In other words, Sinema is a politician who is playing games to get votes. She can’t talk about an assault weapon ban, but one must note that there’s no mention of her opposing one.

Instead, she’s going to push for supposedly “safe” gun control measures that are routinely based on ignorance rather than the actual law. For example, anyone running for the Senate should know that the gun show loophole is a freaking myth. All sales at gun shows conducted by an FFL require a background check anyway. Any sales that take place without one are face-to-face transfers that aren’t covered under the law in most states for anywhere, not just gun shows.

Sinema is pushing herself as a centrist, yet as O’Keefe has pointed out, she’s not. She’s a radical in centrist clothing. She’ll support any gun control measures that come down the pipe, and this much is clear.

Not that it’s surprising. Not from Sinema.

The post Project Veritas Takes Aim At Kyrsten Sinema’s Anti-Gun Views appeared first on Bearing Arms.

View the full article

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Problem is McSally is no better on guns, she bites over and over again for Feinstein type gun control, either way neither one is good for firearms rights. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Who Viewed the Topic

    4 members have viewed this topic:
    Max Hammer Ripcannon Let_Freedom_Ring

Who we are

We are a community of concerned patriots who are not overly confident in the current direction of our society, from the wild political climate to what can be summed up as a lack of morals or a complete void of integrity and pretty much a blatant disregard of respect..... Respect for our past, respect for our future and respect for each other. In order to protect our constitution and life as we know it, we decided to not be the silent majority anymore and pull our selves up by the bootstraps and make the world a better place. This website is to unite people like us, people who want to make a difference ... and do it the right way, Little did we know that in doing so we would create the number one militia community online. Here we are. Enjoy.

Disclaimer

We require all members to think before they post. We understand the issues raised on this site may lead to heated debate, but we still require all users to maintain a respectful environment. My Militia website bears no responsibility for the accuracy of anyone's comments and will bear no responsibility or legal liability for any discussion postings. We reserve the right to remove posts without notice, and the right to ban anyone who willfully violates the rules. All content is posted live with no moderation. If you see something that you think shouldn't be here please report it so we can handle it accordingly. Always respect the privacy of others if something is shared with you in a private fashion such as real names, emails or phone numbers. Please keep them private.
×

Important Information

Your Privacy Is Important To Us Learn More: Privacy Policy