Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Congress fraud in the cfr 49 regulations...

Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135 “The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety.

CFR 49 Regulation 
( for things to be traveled, it must first travel.)
325.33- A, B.1-3, E, F
325.37-C
350.105 (vehicle miles "traveled")
350.311-B2
350.343-A
395.1 (3.j) Travel time—(1) When a property-carrying commercial motor vehicle driver at the direction of the motor carrier is traveling, but not driving or assuming any other responsibility to the carrier, such time must be counted as on-duty time unless the driver is afforded at least 10 consecutive hours off duty when arriving at destination, in which case he/she must be considered off duty for the entire period...

Department of Transportation was established by an act of Congress on October 15, 1966. It had became active in 1967.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

That's infringing. Hell no. I do not comply. If they want my gun. Come get it!

 

 

Edited by Chops

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found the "administrative procedure act".  Which allows rule and regulation making. This is the statute. 

To see that the 49 regulations as a restriction against constitutional law "the right to travel". The supreme court's have already ruled it is a right even in the course of business. Trucking is in the course of business. There are many case laws by the supreme court's stating this. The cfr 49 is in violation against the constitutional law (freedom of movement in section 329, page 1135. This regulation is invalid and fraudulent. The right to travel can not be hindered. CDLs, D.O.T physicals "med Cards" ( possibly more) are a hindrance, which restricts the right to the people to travel/drive while conducting business which has already been ruled by the supreme court's. No agency can make a law under the APA or over rule such rulings by the supreme court's and tho Congress make laws, No law can contradict the rights to the people. Such laws are considered a breach of liberty (freedom) and the laws/regulations are found in violation and fraudulent.
The (APA) also stated these rules and regulations shall not infringe on the constitutional rights/laws. But the CFR 49 does infringe. Even more so than just the right to travel. It also contradicts the 4th amendment, the 14th amendment, the 1st amendment, possibly more. 
And automobile and a motor vehicle are foreseen as the same thing. One is much bigger than the other. Both are propelled by a driveshaft, but in actual mechanical terms, a drive shaft is called a propeller shaft. Therefore both automobile and motor vehicle are propelled by a shaft, and gears and mechanics. To see that the CFR 49 Regulations are in violation of breaching the APA statute and constitutional law. The CFR 49 shall be forfeited and revised to better compliance of the APA which states can not infringe or breach the constitution rights/laws. Here are supreme court rulings (case laws).
 
U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary 
To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets
No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name
1
1
U.S. SUPREME COURT AND OTHER HIGH COURT CITATIONS PROVING THAT 
NO LICENSE IS NECESSARY FOR NORMAL USE OF AN AUTOMOBILE ON COMMON WAYS
"The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-
drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at 
will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under 
this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the 
public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither 
interfering with nor disturbing another's rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe 
conduct." Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135
"The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, 
in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy 
life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the 
right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing 
modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate 
an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business." -Thompson vs. Smith, supra.; 
Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784 
"… the right of the citizen to drive on a public street with freedom from police interference… is a 
fundamental constitutional right" -White, 97 Cal.App.3d.141, 158 Cal.Rptr. 562, 566-67 (1979)
“citizens have a right to drive upon the public streets of the District of Columbia or any other city 
absent a constitutionally sound reason for limiting their access.” Caneisha Mills v. D.C. 2009
“The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life 
requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the
public highways partakes of the nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional 
guarantees. . .” Berberian v. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869, 872, See also: Schecter v. Killingsworth, 380 P.2d 136, 140; 93 Ariz. 273 (1963).
“The right to operate a motor vehicle [an automobile] upon the public streets and highways is not a 
mere privilege. It is a right of liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of the 
federal and state constitutions.” Adams v. City of Pocatello, 416 P.2d 46, 48; 91 Idaho 99 (1966).
“A traveler has an equal right to employ an automobile as a means of transportation and to occupy the public 
highways with other vehicles in common use.” Campbell v. Walker, 78 Atl. 601, 603, 2 Boyce (Del.) 41.
“The owner of an automobile has the same right as the owner of other vehicles to use the highway,* * * A 
traveler on foot has the same right to the use of the public highways as an automobile or any other vehicle.” Simeone v. Lindsay, 65 Atl. 778, 779; Hannigan v. Wright, 63 Atl. 234, 236.
"The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference, 
unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a 
FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts." People v. Horton 
14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971)
“The right to make use of an automobile as a vehicle of travel long the highways of the state, is no longer 
an open question. The owners thereof have the same rights in the roads and streets as the drivers of horses 
or those riding a bicycle or traveling in some other vehicle.” House v. Cramer, 112 N.W. 3; 134 Iowa 374; Farnsworth v. Tampa Electric Co. 57 So. 
233, 237, 62 Fla. 166.
“The automobile may be used with safety to others users of the highway, and in its proper use upon 
the highways there is an equal right with the users of other vehicles properly upon the highways. 
The law recognizes such right of use upon general principles. Brinkman v Pacholike, 84 N.E. 762, 764, 41 Ind. App. 662, 666.
“The law does not denounce motor carriages, as such, on public ways. They have an equal right with other vehicles in 
common use to occupy the streets and roads. It is improper to say that the driver of the horse has rights in the roads 
superior to the driver of the automobile. Both have the right to use the easement.” Indiana Springs Co. v. Brown, 165 Ind. 465, 468.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Who Viewed the Topic

    5 members have viewed this topic:
My Militia site is designed to facilitate an ever growing network of american patriots, those of us engaged in activities contrary to prevailing opinion understand the risks that come with conversing on popular social media platforms. We oversee a significant share of public thought relating to militias to thousands of individuals everyday, This is a lot of responsibility... to remain the most trusted platform where militia ideas and information are exchanged, We proudly proclaim as the de facto authority in everything relating to militias, arbitrating a worldwide exchange of information as well as overseeing the security of the individuals and units who entrust their ideas, work, and private data to our platform. That this mandates a certain responsibility and assurance of good faith, transparency, and due process. As a voluntary user of and contributor to My Militia, such responsibilities will never be betrayed or reneged upon to the detriment of yourself or our community. Common decency demands that we remain vigilant as a trusted force among our people, and for these reasons we will never stand alone and hereby decree that for as long as we stand, so will our site, and if we shall fall, the last of us will purge it from existence.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Your Privacy Is Important To Us Learn More: Privacy Policy