Covert Tactics of the Domestic Enemy

**Todd A. Slee** · November 15, 2019

After years of observing what I believed to be nefarious and often malicious activity by FBI informants, occasionally an acting agent, I discovered recently what the actual dilemma probably has been: Indiana State Police informants, and at times bad handlers.

Select State Police troopers are picked to attend a course at the FBI academy, learning federal tricks of the trade, which includes ways in which to deceive others, without outright lying, part of which includes psychological ploys and warfare, a sub'product or attribute being somewhere between entrapment and frame jobs.

For example, on the light side of it, if you tell an agent that their informers are out of line, they check, discover that it's ISP informants whose handler is FBI qualified, they'll likely just reply back that it's not the Bureau's informants, a half truth.

It's highly probable that the chosen police officers are taught, among more normal federal tactics, how to conduct "black bag" operations, which is highly subject to abuse. Many of their informants somehow acquire those skills, including computer hacking techniques, and largely abuse them, also employing a variety of psychological warfare tactics.

Anyone trained federally can be "grabbed" by a federal or international officer, for any number of esoteric tasks, where they learn via ojt all sorts of clever techniques, not always Constitutional, at all.

More later, time constraint presently; I found online about State Police attending the FBI academy.

Edited November 15, 2019 by Todd A. Slee
Misspelled Word

**Todd A. Slee** · November 16, 2019

I should add that I'm not saying all state cops are unconstitutional, but it don't take but one or two with a sizeable informant network to cause a lot of damage, especially since Obama essentially twisted Constitutionality a lot, with new edicts and reversals, which many blindly follow.

**SecurityGuy42** · November 21, 2019

Ah yes, there are informants in the militia and we have known about that for years. Another common tactic (one they got from starting and running white supremacist groups over the decades) is they start a militia, recruit people to learn as much as possible about them, and then either set them up as a unit or as individuals. Sometimes if they think they can pull it off they intimidate a member to turn them into an informant/instigator. The intimidation can also be enticement such as cash, lighter sentences, drugs, whatever they think the person will want. Legality of what they are offering doesn't mean much because the person is disposable and they will discredit them anyways.

**Todd A. Slee** · November 21, 2019

You know the score. They also at times pull illegal stunts to push someone to do something illegal, or that looks illegal, and later drop the charge on the condition the person, a victim, informs for them.

When I was a street agent in Co. Spgs, Co, acting but commissioned, I never once testified on a case, preferring not to, and one time they totally falsified a few things under testimony in court, against a guy I'd nailed. I found out and wrote the judge, explaining the truth, which exonerated the guy. I mostly tackled gov corruption, though, by informants and cops, but specializing in detection of assassination setup and industrial espionage.

Some bad agents tried to kill myself and my immediate superior in 1994-95, "Blackjack", a CIA agent assigned as FBI, for uncovering their corruption. Lotta tricks in their black bags.

**Todd A. Slee** · November 21, 2019

Ever read about George White, who worked for the CIA in the 70s or 80s I think it was? Bout same now with the rogue ones, just more sly.

Doug1943 · January 6

A very useful thread.

I suspect some of their informants are at this very moment urging weak-minded people in their militia unit to do something stupid (not that they will put it that way) at the Virginia march on the 20th.

I

**Ideological Gambler** · January 6

I have intel suggesting Antifa is attempting a nationwide push to Richmond saying the 2A crowd is there to start a murder spree and 'tactical murder' assault on the legislators are passed and will then turn on civilians. Only one source for it and isnt fully vetted by the RDF yet. The possibility of a antifa presence though is guaranteed and i would always keep an eye out for people on our side acting suspicious.

**LetFreedomRing** · January 6

9 hours ago, Ideological Gambler said:

I have intel suggesting Antifa is attempting a nationwide push to Richmond saying the 2A crowd is there to start a murder spree and 'tactical murder' assault on the legislators are passed and will then turn on civilians. Only one source for it and isnt fully vetted by the RDF yet. The possibility of a antifa presence though is guaranteed and i would always keep an eye out for people on our side acting suspicious.

I expected as much as soon as the information of the rally came out. I'm sure they will do their best to incite a violent clash and also as sure that the police will be ordered to stand down or only arrest the Pro rally people during this rally.....

**RevRifleman** · January 6

11 hours ago, Ideological Gambler said:

I have intel suggesting Antifa is attempting a nationwide push to Richmond saying the 2A crowd is there to start a murder spree and 'tactical murder' assault on the legislators are passed and will then turn on civilians. Only one source for it and isnt fully vetted by the RDF yet. The possibility of a antifa presence though is guaranteed and i would always keep an eye out for people on our side acting suspicious.

The Soros funded orgs are quite practiced at bussing activists all over the country. I'm sure that they will bring in several different flavors. Some angry mom and student groups will probably be their clean image while black bloc will be both in their usual garb and some imitating patriot groups to stir the pot. The thing is they don't need many to imitate militia... It only takes a handful scattered about to start a firestorm.

**Todd A. Slee** · January 7

The Left has people brainwashed into believing they can create some kind of utopia on earth, and everyone will follow suit, probably with wreaths around their necks and flowers in their hair. I guess the terrorists taping their daughters and clubbing their sons will be offstage.

Sad thing is, a supposed utopia will happen, a false one, according to Thessalonians, then all hell will break loose.

**Todd A. Slee** · January 8

They have people truly dumbed down. Back in 2010, I told an informant that people can be watched thru the camcorder on a computer or phone. She told people I was mentally ill for thinking such a thing, and cops, knowing better, or should, go right along with that sort of thing, as an excuse to pick on people. We have a very ignorant society.

Bergmeister · January 14

Did any of you see the Fox program Scandalous regarding the Randy Weaver affair? Just as soon as the shooting started a police voice is heard on the radio saying: "Call the state police".

The state police are the Highway Patrol (in California) or are known mostly as State Troopers. What service do this perform? They are always organized to police the state and interstate highways but always devolved into a force of occupation for the ruling elite of that state. Cities have police. Rural people have the Sheriff. Nobody needs the State Police.

In some states the federal government is more friendly than the state government. In the latter, the Left relies of them to protect they from "Right Wing Extremists" who they know have firearms. There is no guarantee the National Guard will do state bidding---these people are mostly veterans and have real jobs so they don't owe their livelihood to their state. They may also be barred from some law enforcement activities---especially if Trump were to federalize them. Local Sheriffs certainly cannot be counted to to disarm people--they are elected. This leaves the State Police to put down uprisings. These people can never be trusted in my mind are are redundant everywhere except in their role to suppress the people.

Bergmeister · January 14

I have had ten years experience dealing with the FBI on FOIA requests. If you think there are "good men and women of the FBI" like Hannity always says---find five of them. No, I'll take that back, find one of them. These mothers lie all the time about everything. Ask Tom Fitton. They lie about things they have right out of the box--saying "no record". If you do an appeal, it comes back the same way---and I mean about everything, everything. To the spy agencies everything is classified by default. You have no need to know. And they don't care about the law.

The only way to get files out of them is to trick them. This is the art form of researchers. But even then, even when you give them the bin number, box number and file number of something you want, they will say they can't find it or it is out of file---and so another appeal.

The spy agencies which are truly evil and dishonest are the FBI, CIA, NSA, and U.S. National Archives. YES, the U.S. National Archives is a spy agency. Congress mandated the military and civilian agencies of the government to turn over files after a certain number of years. They send them to the U.S. National Archives (USNA). But the USNA has no filing system which they make public. So it all goes into a warehouse with no sort of filing system at all----THEY SAY. When you push them on this they say there is a system with the designation N.A.I. L. The problem with this system is, using it, it won't even produce files the FBI has already given you. So, the USNA is a defacto re-classification operation and that is all it is.

The CIA is much worse than the FBI. All the military intelligence organizations, Army, Navy, Air Force, are wonderful and simply follow the law and do their duty. They will go out of their way to help you and even declassify things on their own and send them to you without asking for declassification.

There are big divisions within the intelligence world and they go back at least to Clinton.

**Todd A. Slee** · January 14

Can't say I disagree, especially now. In '94 there were a few good ones in Colorado Springs, though. Two came to me, when I was an acting agent, to tell me about an unconstitutional sting against militias they were being forced to participate in. I'd signed no confidentiality statement, took no oath, so I wasn't much suppressed, then or now, on what I could reveal. Going thru the channels didn't help, though my immediate superior, a street agent, would have negated it. So I went to that militia and told them, provided them a few months to prepare, nobody got much time. Our regional director was sure ticked about them finding out. He was a real doozy. They finally got to me, asked if I knew who had tipped the militia off, I said yep, I did, and told them why. The feds had their fly unzipped on that one, nothing they could really do. I was independent, wasn't on any payroll, unless cases I worked, which was gov corruption, got completely solved and properly closed, which none ever did, imagine that. All I cared about was stopping gov corruption and garnering hours towards a p.i. license. I'd tick them off, they'd yell, I'd laugh and say to fire me, then. They never did, I quit in '95. In retrospect, though, I believe now they were just patronizing me, and never intended to use the info I gained from investigating in a Constitutional way.

**Todd A. Slee** · January 15

One thing most people are unaware of is how extensively the FBI, CIA and police use the temporary employment services to insert informants and undercover investigators into places of employ, thus taking a job away from someone who really needs it.

The entire investigative and undercover situation has become largely just a farce, a blatant misuse of authority and information gained.

Sometimes they do right, but most of what I've seen is abuse of power.

**Todd A. Slee** · January 15

One thing most people are unaware of is how extensively the FBI, CIA and police use the temporary employment services to insert informants and undercover investigators into places of employ, thus taking a job away from someone who really needs it.

The entire investigative and undercover situation has become largely just a farce, a blatant misuse of authority and information gained.

Sometimes they do right, but most of what I've seen is abuse of power.

The management of places which hire many work release people, at least condescend some to police or the respective judicial entity, but abuse still occurs, not necessarily known to management of the civilian company, but it may be, just depends.

Ever since the CDL program and it's related counterparts, the workplace has changed, being under more control by the government and subjecting employees to more undue scrutiny by informants and police.

Anytime work release people are anywhere, the cops are going to be checking around, at least some. One of the biggest glitches is that when their subjugees do anything at all out of line concerning rules, that gives the presiding cop a lever to use. Most informants/work release people are going to do whatever is required to stay out of jail; cops, agents and operatives are fond of undermining things that law abiding dissenters against tyrannical practices do, requiring the renegade cop or agent to gather normal, everyday, non-criminal information about their target.

**Todd A. Slee** · January 16

One issue most people are missing is what I'll call the Old England syndrome, a repeat of what went on there during the 1500s thru the 1700s.

The church basically ruled the roost, which was only one denomination then, but now, certain ones have the predominance within each area, casting people down in varioys ways who speak against nefarious things they do or refute doctrinal errors. And many are utilizing the government to do so.

There are a lot more church members (unChristian ones) who think people should be killed, or at least taken to nothing, who don't believe the way they do, or at least abide by Christian precepts, which are twisted anyway by those who believe that way.

A lot of manipulating of people occurs by so-called believers who afflict people in all sorts of devious, underhanded, overbearing and often secretive, ways, behind a guise of "saving their soul", needing saved themselves, using misinterpreted scripture to justify their methods and agenda of self will.

It'd be interesting to see how many laws are based on a certain religion, rather than just right or wrong.

The Stormy Daniels situation is a prime example of churchmen crossing the line. They had no business having that strip club checked out. That's law enforcement's place to do so. Like it or not, they have as much a right to have a strip club as they do to have a church.

I don't go in them, no reason to, nor church very often, due to erroneous teaching and condescending attitudes. Either could be a chosen religion, right or wrong. All that church in Ohio did was to set a bad example of religious exclusivism, of sorts.

If you want to see some unconstitutionally evil attitudes, scripturally, and correctly, disagree with any given denominational doctrine. Then watch what they do. Most churches now would throw Christ or Paul, or other disciples, out on their ear.

I see the organized church, as contrasted with the true church, as being the biggest problem, especially trying to legislate religion, noting a difference between what our laws are meant to be based upon, Judaism, and the Gospel, which is to be separate from the government.

**Todd A. Slee** · January 16