Jump to content
I3DI

The State of our Union - Civil War

Recommended Posts

Each year the President addresses Congress, every time, the same statement, "The state of our Union..." and it's good, couldn't be better.  Is this the truth?

 

We find ourselves at the Crossroads of decisions.  You have two sides in this, demonic, lunatics, evil, sadistic tyrants with no common sense, pedophile, god and life hating, men hating, America hating, mob, and you have the common sense, God fearing, America Loving, soldiers, family men.  I am writing this today with a heavy heart, as I have been in much contemplation.  The last week has yielded some absolute truth, and the questions I will pose here are questions that must be answered and come to a inevitable conclusion.

 

First, I wish to discuss how I ended up in court.  It is over my children.  My original lawyer, liberal, lefty, thief, violated SCR guidelines.  My appointed lawyer in court, when I addressed the court on the VIII amendment, the basic human right to the presumption of innocence and the violation thereof, and asked that simple question, "How do you measure fear?", on the record she stated, "This judge does not have time for your diatribes!"  She sprawled out all over the table in upset and frustration.  She with held evidence requested despite request for the last three months.  No communication.  No defense, or interest in defense.  It was not until I meet this 14 year police office who committed no crime had the same two lawyers in common and I began looking into the DA that prosecuted his case, who perjured herself in court, I began to realize, this was a kangaroo court.  I can safely make this statement, the legal system has been hijacked.  This is not to preclude there are not good men, as a matter of fact, men I have spoken to and the ones that know this judge, over and over again have attested, "This man is out to make a difference."  I have been asked to "Share" by this judge, it's a diplomatic invitation because he is looking for answers and I have asked many questions that can be answered and thus, despite the risk to myself, since these are the last minutes to catastrophe in hopes there can be a persuasion to action from this judge, courage and truth can win out.

 

I want to address the men.  In 42 years of my life we have put up with the courts interference in family.  Men's groups, fathers groups, trillions of dollars spent, it has not changed things.  You have children, the relationship goes bad, she gets the property at your expense.  The petition I have enclosed here addresses the weapon being employed.  It's human nature.  Obviously you authorize a woman to take the property at another's expense, her nature will do so.  But, men have been made felons in matters that breach our highest laws as you will find laid out in this petition I will be filing, despite the Supreme Court now showing who they really are.  Obviously, you abuse men, their nature is to react with anger, and you impoverish them, rob them, demoralize them, then you find yourself in a situation where the number of men responding with anger are increasing and then you make it against the law to be a natural man.

 

The eighth amendment is a good example of what I call, "Amendment by proxy."  In our system of law you have two classifications of law, natural law, the God given rights that can not be taken, only surrendered, and human law, those laws made by man to re-enforce the natural law, uphold it, distribute it equally.  According to Article V of the Constitution, there can be no amendment except by two thirds of the house of representatives and Congress, or by two thirds of all the states legislatures.  Knowing that amending these can not occur without waking up the public, or perhaps it's impossible to do at this time, instead you take human law and create exceptions.  Exceptions are amendments using human law to over write your natural law, or God given rights.  

 

The first "Amendment by proxy" was in "Separation of Church and State".  "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion of prohibiting the free exercise thereof.".  The Supreme Court made their first exception to this by using letters from Benjamin Franklin, a violation of their oaths to uphold the Constitution not letters, and stated, well, you can practice anywhere but in the Federal Government.  This, of course, being the most critical place anyone should have bedrock morals and hence now evil is hanging out up there all over.  Our response, nothing. Your God given right, natural law, it was surrendered thru your's and mine, inaction.

 

What you are reading in the enclosed petition encapsulates what was going on long before I was born in 1977.  As a mathematician, software developer, scientist, and now, working on becoming a legal professional, what I will say is when you have one-thousand variables and eight-hundred and sixty-four of them all lead to the same conclusion, this is no longer a accident, it is by design.  This is very much like courts accepting DNA, even though you don't get one-hundred percent conclusion the man is the father of a child, you get ninety-six percent and that concludes "This man is the father of this child."

 

While this petition may diverge into two separate petitions, and I am working with a Wisconsin defense attorney, Constitutional, gun strapping, award winner, who I developed and host his website and am developing a mobile app for, the arguments in here are conclusive, not speculative.  I wish to lay out what has been the plan, what will be coming, and the final conclusion.  Make this a note, in bold, "NO ACTION, NO RESPONSE, IS A ACTION.  NO ACTION IS SURRENDER."

 

The first statement is, men, the courts have been in violation of the bedrock principal of measurement in regards to family.  I will put this in questions I will be presenting to the court.  "How do you measure the decision between two people to have a relationship?", "How do you measure the decision between to human beings to create a life?", "How do you measure when that decision goes bad?", "How do you measure a single human being and the time he spends between mother and father?".  The answer is, "You can't."  Courts are obligated under the Constitution to only take those things that can be measured and administrate equal justice.  By removing measurement, the bedrock principal of limitation is removed and the government is no longer limited and in matters of the subjective.  Further more, when the courts authorize child support on the father and default the custody of the children, already in family where they Constitutionally can not be, they have violated Section I of Article XIV of the Constitution.  The judicial branch is the most powerful branch in government, and it is charge in this Article with the protection of your LIFE, LIBERT, AND PROPERTY.  That child is your property and her property, he or she can not be divided and matters of family being subjective can not be administrated but now, by authorizing one side at your men's expense to have the property, the human nature of a women is to obviously, take the child and the money.  I have coined this as, "Legalized kidnapping and theft."  In fourty-two years of my life, for the trillions spent, all the men that have fought, what has changed?  Nothing, because this was by design.  The principal is, impoverish the men, abuse the men, force them to capitulate and their nature to be angry over the abuse to come out.

 

Currently in my case I have a DVD, finally that was forced from this lawyer with emails in which I discussed this very thing with a twenty-two year friend of mine.  While I was told to go to court, my response time and time again was, "The system is rigged, for the thousands I would spend I get nothing but the bill.  This is being maintained and there will be no change because it's by design."  I called this thirteen years in advance.  The money from filing fees has been turned against you to fund more over reaches by government.  My thirteen year old child is terminally ill now, his mother ran state to state for thirteen years with him, even when the arrears were paid in full, she continues to steal the agreed upon child tax income credit.  This means she is falsifying a Federal tax return, to which I am now preparing to sue her and demanding prosecution.  I have seen this child a maximum of seven times in his life as a result.  Despite my ex-wife taking my daughter, with holding her, and no response to three letters demanding a reason on why she was being with held, there was no response.  This was provocation on her part and ultimately I capitulated under the abuse and issued threats to which I am being charged.  But, yet, what is to be said except that under Section I Article XIV of the Constitution the court is obligated to protect my property.

 

Now, lets address the matter of money in the court.  Family is a big business.  It's also why you have sex trafficking and pedophile rings.  In the conversations I state "For the money I would spend, I would only get the bill."  Court has become a business.  Your justice, your legal recourse is a matter of financial gain.  Again, this violates Section I Article XIV of the Constitution.  The one place every person must be able to come is the legal system.  When courts became a business, this made it only the arena of the rich and powerful, those who are corrupt and they have taken your money to twist and corrupt laws with a inevitable, horrible plan we are witnessing unfold in front of us.  Not only have they demoralized men, they have impoverished them, and there is a purpose.  They took that money, used it to buy off your elections and right to choice, fund Child Protective Services who gets bonuses for any child they put into adoption, hence why they show up and without due process take your children, and hence why many children are now in pedophile rings around the country.  Now we have confirmed, not speculatively, that Section I Article XIV of the Constitution is in violation because you can not distribute equal justice or meet the obligations thereof when only a certain class of people may come before the court.  The court is a government branch and must be funded as such, and justice is not a matter of "Profit, but principal."  This has lead to the lawless state we are now in, government not restrained, lives and families destroyed, men destitute, please note, in all cases, it's the "Men".

 

Thru our own history, threats have been used many times by historical figures, Wyatt Earp, Doc Holiday, General Patton, that is the short list.  My question in these proceedings using "Open Justice", British Common Law, the system of transparency in the court on which it was founded, is, "How do you measure fear?"  The VIII Amendment guarantees me a sentence proportional to the crime.  Nobody can answer this simple question.  The truth is, "You can't."  It's subjective.  The courts involvement in matters of the subjective and not action is again, the removal of limitation on government thru legislation that violates the original principal, "A eye for a eye, a tooth for a tooth."  Fear can be used to stand down a confrontation, it can be used to bring people to the table for compromise, it can be used to intimidate, or, let a person know, you have taken what is mine, I want it back.  Coming up, my questions will be, "Do you have the budget to administrate the passions of every man and woman?"  My answer, "I think not."  A man walking into Walmart and shooting ten people, that is measurable, "Death penalty ten times for him."  Again, abuse the men, bring out their nature, then make it a crime, and while your at it, take the guns.  Notice, it's the men.  Notice it's the guns.  The violations of Section I Article XIV, our VIII Amendment in this, not speculative.  Please look up that the prior supreme court, two on it appointed by Bill Clinton who has been on the Lolita Express, twenty-seven times, a murderer, war monger, have stated that "At Face Petitions are not preferred because they are speculative."  Nothing in this is speculative, it's spot on, fact.  Please look up the difference between a "At Face Petition" and a "As Applied Petition" in Constitutional challenges.

 

I have coined the phrase, "Amendment by proxy" in the over reaches of our government.  A example of this would be "Freedom of Speech."  Our first amendment is very clear, "The freedom of speech shall not be abridged."  This means, "Not crossed.", "Not limited."  The judicial is to uphold and administrate these at face value and is not a legislative power.  However, the judges took that legislative power and said this, "Well, freedom of speech applied to everything, EXCEPT..."  These exceptions are amendments using human law, a legislative function only granted to Congress in Article V.  While they can render a opinion, only Congress may legislate.  Please refer to Article V of the Constitution in regards to amending the Constitution.  All these exceptions, again, they are used to make laws that when abuses happen and the nature of men or women come out, they then create laws on these exceptions that wrap you up.  The overwhelming target is men.  In Eau Claire, Chippewa, and Dunn County here in Wisconsin, I was surprised to find out from another lawyer that there is only one Woman's jail for three counties, hence why a certain woman last year was given four signature bonds and she was bail jumping, robbing businesses in each case, where as a man, I would have been held tell court under those violations.  Her actions being measurable.  Notice again, the men are the overwhelming majority.

 

I wish to address the special immunity Congress officials have.  For three years we Christians, Conservative, Common Sense people have enjoyed the privilege of them "Inciting Civil Unrest", "Terrorist Threats", and while myself and other veterans have called the FBI, demanded their arrest, where are the arrests, where are the police?  Under United States Codes, these are violations of their oaths of office, which disqualifies them immediately, but also, if I can be prosecuted for such, should they not be?  I would also state, Inciting Civil Unrest with intent to overthrow the United States of America is a measurable action and must be prosecuted.  In 2016 they miscalculated, in 2018 I have acquired enough evidence to show 25 million votes taken, gone in the wind.  I have gone thru states, developed a map and overlay, spread sheet and the overwhelming evidence shows that they take a state by fiat, then the open up Sanctuary cities in the counties that hold the most electoral power to keep that state.  In Oregon, they did not win the election, they stole it by "Indicting Republicans for a Ham Sand Which."  They were trumped up and false, no prosecutions, just filing to disqualify them from being elected.  They used that disqualification principle I just stated about actual Congress officials committing measurable crimes to steal a state.  Antifa, they show up anywhere, they have uniforms, they have battle tactics, they have guns, they have violently put people in the Hospital, thrown acid in peoples faces.  Where are the police?  Where are the Indictments?  The police and judges have been paid off, or they are compromised. 

 

In my arguments I conclude, only those things that are measurable can be prosecuted.  Men are subjective to lust, greed, corruption, decadence and history shows us this.  The bedrock principal of measurement exists for this purpose so that men can not be compromised except for those things they do.  A person violating a child and making a video, a child screaming in the process, that's measurable, get him, prosecute him, jail him.  However, how do you measure when a man, who has a sex addiction and has depersonalized what he sees and disconnected the sexual act of child pornography from a human being?  As much as you might hate it, and as morally reprehensible as it may be, what you view is between you and God.  If what you viewed was paid for, that's measurable, if not, then you can't prosecute it.  Imagine if the men up top, who had viewed these, not measurable, illegal things could not be prosecuted for what they viewed?  Could they be easily compromised and turn on the American public?  I think not.  My case and point, you do not prosecute people for anything they view, hear or say, only those things they do.  Next stop is, what you think!

 

I wish to address the votes.  In this country, the contract is, I get to choose who governs and as a result I follow the laws that are written.  In video testimony before congress, it was confirmed that 2.5 to 10.5 million votes were taken in the 2016 election.  I have Video of high level people admitting, "We've been stealing the votes for years!"  I can prove beyond reasonable doubt, twenty of those Congressional seats are stolen.  I can confirm, beyond reasonable doubt, multiple governor races were stolen in 2018.  They didn't miss a step in stealing the election in 2018.  Under Title 18 U.S.C. Chapter 5, there are several legal ramifications.  First, when you take one-hundred million Americans right to choose who governs, no longer do you have any obligation to conform to the human laws that are written.  Second, you can no longer validate the authenticity of the legislation as being the authentic will of the people.  Last, you have committed treason under Title 18 U.S.C. 2381 and 2384, as you have installed a fiat government over the elected one.  That is, and does qualify as overthrow of the United States Government.  Cicero stated, "Laws fall silent in times of war."  Under the prior mentioned, the human laws have been rendered mute, ineffective, they no longer are valid, and you have already been conquered and over thrown.  The truth is, it's your obligation to free your selves at this time.

 

I wish to elaborate on another dangerous weapon that has no legal qualification, it is unchecked, Psychology.  A man visits and say's, "Doctor I am experiencing...'(x, y, z)'", the doctor replies, "I FEEL you have..."  then he prescribes drugs.  Anything in this profession is subjective and how dangerous it is when you FEELING issues out toxic drugs that have been confirmed to be behind the mass shootings in this country.  I've spent years in counseling, you must be careful who you choose because most is very subjective.  The purpose of counseling is to make peace with your past, and to change your point of view on the traumas.  I am all for this.  However, it does no good to change my point of view when I am continuing to be abused in my own home, A.K.A. (Country).  After World War I and II, German Scientist, who has committed mass atrocities were let in to our country.  They brought to you radiation, toxic drugs, but, what is not considered is, the Germans had perfected something more dangerous, Psychological Warfare, to which, currently, we have no legal definition.  I can only conclude this can be defined only by it's intent.  These Germans immediately established Psychology and entered into the legal professions in this country.  One must only rationalize, "Considering their propensity for human life, I would think they didn't have good intentions."  Over the years, the men, by nature, being abused, have gone to counseling, been prescribed drugs, and this is effective in that, as your God given rights are taken by proxy, and your abuses increase, and your bondage increases, the counselor is there to adjust you to the new "Normal" or "Abuse".  This has had the impact of rendering men ineffective in calling all this for what it is.  Again, it's the men that are the main target, to which I will get to the reason behind this.

 

Our founding fathers were against "Centralization".  The reason being is, anything centralized can be taken over and used against the people.  They separated all three branches of government for this reason.  During the 1960's our economic decline was put into motion with the removal of our currency off the "Gold" standard, but the real weapon employed was the centralization of our schooling system, the connecting of that school system to the Federal Government, and, over time, it has been employed to slowly adjust generations of American to new, "Norms" well outside the realm of common sense and reason.  It has been used to teach children to "Hate America", our history is evil, worse, now it's being used to groom your children to meet the sexual needs of the deranged, perverse and evil.  The target, again, boys, who become men.  Even now, a father is in court trying to keep the mother from chopping off his testicles in a sex change, and the judge has descended on that boy, all he needs to say is, "I believe i am a girl."  One must ask, why the boys, why the men?

 

Why the boys?  Why the men?  For eight thousand years of recorded history, men have been the defenders of culture.  They are the protectors, providers.  All the prior lead to one conclusion, testify to the truth, you have been conquered from within, they are now cementing their reign.  To do this, you must eliminate the men.  You must take the guns.  Men must be demoralized.  In two years alone I have heard more men say, "There is no point, I give up."  The men must be kept fighting to survive in their impoverishment so they can't resist.  Yes, all these "Amendments by proxy.", they are simply to tuck men away, take their weapons, demoralize them, incapacitate them.  When a country is taken over, historically, the flag is taken down and the men are killed.  The women are then sport, and have we been seeing how much these people, "LOVE" your children.  Special isn't it?

 

Fear is the greatest adversary you will face in your life.  The purpose of life is to master your fear or it will master you.  I have mastered mine and what I will say in conclusion is the truth, the obvious before us, and already I have been accused of trying to incite unrest on here to solve my legal issues, but I am simply speaking the truth and all the prior facts, not speculative, those are the ones pushing what the truth concludes and my answers to this judge in April will be the answers thru out history to what is clearly laid out in this article.  The reason people do not say, "We are down to force." is, you might get in trouble, your afraid.  The reason good men, good judges know the truth and just keep following those hijacked rules is, they are afraid.  If you speak the truth and are honest about our predicament, you will be attacked, assaulted, accused.  If your going to take accountability and lead, you will take damage.  You will get hurt, but that is the price of your freedom.  If you speak out and you act, as you should, you might be killed.

 

I will address the church in this first, you are to follow the laws of the land until they directly cross the laws of Christ.  The human laws are in violation of Gods laws, enumerable.  The natural laws, those are the highest laws of our land as well and they give you the right to defend your selves.  The human laws of the land, by evidence and legal precedent are rendered invalid, you are now following the natural laws.  Jesus prayed for unity in the church, I have the reason.  Over the years I have watched people preach about what we are seeing, all were right and all were wrong.  You see, God never gives all divine revelation to any one church, or individual.  Everybody has a piece and if all those pieces were to come together, it would be more powerful than any physical weapon.  Trinity, Holy Spirit, all these divisive issues, they do not matter.  Jesus last words on the cross were, "Father, forgive them for they know not what they do."  You can set all divisive issues aside because you are allow ignorance.  Nobody will ever have a perfect interpretation or doctrine, we will see people there we never thought and others we though would be in heaven, they will not be there.  The focus point for all Christians, man, woman and child is, Jesus Christ.  He is the ONLY way, and only by him, his blood and when you all come together under him and just love one another in Christ and accept the imperfections of others and unite, then you become more powerful than conquerors.  You do this every day in your marriage, your spouse is never perfect, has faults, but, you overlook the faults and love her as Christ loved the church and admonish only the good things, she blossoms and the return is more than you ever invest.  The same applies to your fellow Christians, brothers and sisters in Christ.  You must unite on this, in him, Jesus alone.

 

I will address the Militias at this point.  Legally I have pointed out all the cases.  The facts are true and correct.  In this takeover, you have been wrapped up.  You have been told you take orders from the President which comes down from a Centralized entity.  Centralization is a violation of our bedrock principals Constitutionally, it was a exception so that you were tied to the government they have taken over.  The truth is, you are the defenders of the majority of people in your state.  The President is Government, like it or not.  This was a hijacking of our line of defense.  Constitutional, great, appreciate it, but your down to brass tax now.  Your weapons will no longer be manufactured soon, that's how these Supreme Court people who uncloaked with their ruling on November 12th, 2019, took your second amendment.  They already hijacked the first amendment as a weapon.  Only you can decide what to do with this.  However, those rulers in Congress, immune, not by legal standards but by proxy, fiat, they must be handcuffed, removed and nobody can allow them to remove and kill a standing president.  If the FBI, Department of Justice will not indict, arrest or even disqualify these people, then our founding documents make it clear, it is the people that fix these issues.

 

While I will tell the judge the same thing in April, I agree with changing your point of view but it does no good if I am continuing to be abused in my own home and will make the case as above, I will issue the same statement there with no regard.  I will ask the questions as above, but, I will say what I am saying now, when the votes and then the legal recourse were taken, what is left, force.  Yeah, that word nobody wants to admit or employ.  I will ask him, "Are you prepared to surrender twenty-two years of service, work, accomplishments because your to afraid to stand up to this?  Are you ready to surrender your wife, children and grand children, because your to afraid to call this for what it is?"  My statement at this point is the one said thru history, "I will not surrender my inalienable rights to you, on behalf of you.  I did the memorial dog tags of many soldiers when I was in Iraq, I had them down to the millimeter.  I refuse to believe they mastered their fear and paid the ultimate price so you could capitulate to yours and surrender yourself and everyone out there.  You answer to me, you answer to them.  You are accountable to the people.  That is our way and accountability is a two way street."

 

The answer at this time is the one we dread, it's the one that has to be called.  These people must be brought to justice, and it has come to this place because of our inaction for so long and refusal to simply acknowledge the truth.  Really, when the supreme court ruled in Roe vs. Wade, we should have had them arrested and now, because of our inaction and refusal to pay the ultimate price, sixty million babies murdered, sex trafficking, your children are sex toys, dead children after being mutilated and tortured for fun.  That's what this has become.  We have been sold out, handed over, and the dooms day clock on America is not minutes to midnight, it's seconds to midnight.  In the absence of compromise people, force is the answer and when all systems have failed and all avenues are taken, raise the flag, get close to God and fight like your lives depend on it, because they do, or you can surrender those rights, your wives, your children and be like the Jews in Germany, lambs to the slaughter.  Yeah, they might call it a crime, but its not, its your right.  Thirty five states maintain articles of Revolution.  It is the right of the people to come together to abolish or reform government at any time in recognition of what our founding fathers stated in our Declaration of Independence about when abuses become intolerable.

 

It's not preferable, but all these facts, all these lead to one place and one place only and the only way out is the way you would not go.  The only way out is in.  Adjust your view to this truth.  No more call the sky, "Red" when it is clearly, "Blue"  Master your fear.  It has paralyzed you.  If I can master my fear, state and speak the obvious, I believe all of you can to.  One person can change the world, one hundred million can turn this around, but there are some things you have to fight for, this is that time.

 

God Bless.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Petition for Facial Challenge to Statute - The Measure of Fear.pdf

Edited by I3DI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with some of what you say.  But please stop trying to tie your court issues with the need for a Civil War.  Every time you post something the more I think the judge may be on to something.  The War will happen and it will happen soon.  I am amazed it hasn't happened yet with all the pushing the Deep State and Globalists have been doing since the 1990s.  You may insult us for not immediately picking up arms and starting a war over your court problems but some of us are looking at things from a Field Grade or General Officer level and not from the level of a Private fresh from Basic full of bravado.  We take into account the larger ramifications of what will occur.  It will happen and when it does I will respond, "It's about F**king time".  The restraints will be off and I will hold nothing back in the fight.  And I will not stop till every inch of US soil here and in our territories overseas are free and the Constitution restored.  Some of us have been preparing for this for a very very long time.  But we will not be the ones to start the fight.  That action is reserved for the Globalists and their mindless hordes of leftists.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, SecurityGuy42 said:

I agree with some of what you say.  But please stop trying to tie your court issues with the need for a Civil War.  Every time you post something the more I think the judge may be on to something.  The War will happen and it will happen soon.  I am amazed it hasn't happened yet with all the pushing the Deep State and Globalists have been doing since the 1990s.  You may insult us for not immediately picking up arms and starting a war over your court problems but some of us are looking at things from a Field Grade or General Officer level and not from the level of a Private fresh from Basic full of bravado.  We take into account the larger ramifications of what will occur.  It will happen and when it does I will respond, "It's about F**king time".  The restraints will be off and I will hold nothing back in the fight.  And I will not stop till every inch of US soil here and in our territories overseas are free and the Constitution restored.  Some of us have been preparing for this for a very very long time.  But we will not be the ones to start the fight.  That action is reserved for the Globalists and their mindless hordes of leftists.

My case is tied to the issues.  We are already in a civil war.  The point laid out that I am pushing is that the laws were hijacked.  My case, many cases are not in the scope of the government but yet they are in it.  The point i am making, is, for years, because of fear, nobody is calling the ball.  Before you can even think about reform with violence, which, I will say, read, commit to memory "Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire" by Edward Gibbons, this outlines a saga that is happening here now, at this time.  Nobody, absolutely nobody has confronted these judges and verbally, with men at their back, with these legalities because of fear.  That is ceasing in April.  Courage is the first weapon in war.  Courage has the power to turn fear on it's face.  The lower courts, this man, 22 years on the bench has ALL ability to turn this on it's face.  The unconstitutionality of these legislations, the fact you can no longer confirm them as valid under U.S. Code, these all play into the bigger picture.

 

If you can persuade, who, by the way, I can confirm, HE KNOWS THE TRUTH, but he is afraid to act so he continues and thus there is no change.  I KNOW he wants to change things.  The only answer to change is that in his 22 years of service, he has other good judge buddies, because Good Men keep Good Men around them.  My issue, family issues, they are outside the realm of the government, now you have the reason for all this hanging out in the open up top.  I am making my stand because I will not, I WILL NOT, continue to allow them to take my God given rights and plaster me, and until you have confronted them, you have no right to go any further than warning and words.  Weapons come last, and MUST come last.  

 

You also don't understand the law.  How it works.  One issue I have noted, most people, don't care about how things work.  One case, in many, this one, opens the door.  You must walk thru it.  That's how it works.  So, any case that arises in which these issues have over reached, is a case and must be ACTED on.  I am not tying my case into civil war, it is already tied in, because the war, raging around you at this moment, is why my case and many others are in the hands of these lower courts, because the highest have been hijacked and the laws come down, the lower just administrate them.  My hope, is, by holding him accountable at FACE, with the legal knowledge and COURAGE, along with those things which people WILL NOT SAY, BECAUSE OF FEAR, will provoke the change that must happen.  He has more power in that ink and pen then I do in a million words, he's never once used it.

 

I will explain what I am going to tell him to you. "If I was a evil man, I'd hijack your laws, because I know you will follow them.  I'd bring to you psychology where in the privacy of my office I would change peoples Ideology while keeping information I didn't need to share.  I'd issue out the drugs, with warm smiled, maybe a occasional hug, while I pulled out the rug of the America for which you care."  If you want to beat the rules, you can only beat them with spirit.  "Spirit is courage and the ability to confront the obvious in the face of fear."  He can't play by the man made laws anymore.  America has been around for 7.38% of the entire worlds recorded history.  In it's infancy it had a proud tradition of rebellion.  There are times, when rebellion is a necessity and a good thing.  This is that time.  He as all ability to call the ball with many men over his years that know the truth, but he doesn't because he is afraid.  I am afraid, I am terrified, but, I am going to come out with courage and state what is silently in the background.  It's called, "Setting the example."  They know the truth, he might call me a "Conspiracy Theorist" out of fear, not ignorance.  He might decide not to grant my one request as a result.  He might persecute me, or, do something vile.  But, he might take the truth and with inspiration thru one man, do something different over time or immediately.  I know what to say, and I know how to say it, and this is my gifting in life.  I have the legal knowledge and precedent as well as the evidence if required.  If you can persuade a legal rebellion using our laws so the fight is going up, then you've won something and this Roger Stone case only cements the reality.  Fear is the issue, so I have the men that he respects and will listen to, I am the mouth piece, I am going for the gold.

 

If it fails, then you know, there is no other recourse then force.  I will concede to that option.  I will call for it.  But, you must try to hold them accountable first and inspire before anything else.  It's a opportunity.  Opportunities like this only open up with cases.  You dont' get into court without money, or by a case brought against you.  So again, not tying my case in, it is a prime example and it's there, take it and it is by default a example of the problem.  It' testifies to the problem.  THE REAL PROBLEM!

Edited by I3DI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is VERY IMPORTANT that the phrase "civil war", as applied to some future state of affairs in the US, ALWAYS be tied to illegal actions -- such as a coup attempt -- BY THE LEFT.   

 

That is to say, if a "civil war" occurs, it will be because the increasingly-bold and confident far Left has decided to simply abrogate the Constitution, and move towards a seizure of power, perhaps in the context of a contested election result, and/or a national military humiliation.  (Communists took power in Russia because of continual Russian defeats in WWI, which demoralized the army. They attempted to take power in Germany after Germany's defeat in the same war, but were not successful. Communists in China multiplied their support many times because of China's humiliation by Japan). 

 

In other words, a "civil war" will be something forced on the law-abiding majority of Americans, who will be defending the Constitution and the legal order, just as they had to in 1861. 

 

The hard Left have got some very smart people at the top.  They are not so stupid as to casually throw  around the idea of an attempted coup by their side, a "civil war" initiated by them.  In any case, they don't have the firepower. They intend to use the firepower of the existing state.  They don't want to fight the militia -- they want American law enforcement and the military to do their job for them.

 

You have to read pretty deeply into the documents and history of the Left to understand their world-view, and why an anti-democratic seizure of power is, for the genuine Marxists among them, an absolutely standard, non-controversial idea .... but one which they have learned to hide.  They're not stupid.

 

So although the Left despise the majority of Americans, and wouldn't hesitate to impose a dictatorship on them -- this is the only way socialism can exist -- they are not fools. 

 

They know that everything they write is recorded somewhere and can be taken -- out of context or in context -- and used against them in a trial. (It happened to them seventy years ago. They haven't forgotten.) 

 

We have to be as smart as they are.

 

I personally feel the phrase "civil war" is a dangerous and unnecessary one, but if anyone is compelled to use it, please please please make it crystal clear that you are talking about something which is initiated by the other side, and not something which occurs because our side finds itself in a political minority in the US in the future, or doesn't like the outcome of a legal impeachment process, or a Supreme Court ruling.

 

Yes ... in superficial visual Hollywood terms, a group of citizens armed with serious weaponry and trained to execute light weapons infantry maneuvers, on the one hand, and the concepts of  Order, Legality, the Consittuion, on the other -- are counterposed.  In fact, in the long run, they are completely complementary.   Law requires Force behind it.

 

Just remember: everything which is posted on this board and on any other political board, is recorded permanently, and scanned and indexed for ready retreival by people who intend to use it as evidence against the militia movement in a future trial.  They have already, in a recent academic article, floated the idea of labelling the militia movement a "private army". And private armies are already illegal.

 

Don't believe me?  Look here: https://www.lawfareblog.com/armed-militias-are-taking-trumps-civil-war-tweets-seriously 

 

The difference between a lawless armed mob, and a real militia, is discipline.  In a voluntary movement, this comes down to self-discipline. 

 

Fire on command, not when you feel like it. This also applies to what you write and say.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Doug1943 said:

It is VERY IMPORTANT that the phrase "civil war", as applied to some future state of affairs in the US, ALWAYS be tied to illegal actions -- such as a coup attempt -- BY THE LEFT.   

 

That is to say, if a "civil war" occurs, it will be because the increasingly-bold and confident far Left has decided to simply abrogate the Constitution, and move towards a seizure of power, perhaps in the context of a contested election result, and/or a national military humiliation.  (Communists took power in Russia because of continual Russian defeats in WWI, which demoralized the army. They attempted to take power in Germany after Germany's defeat in the same war, but were not successful. Communists in China multiplied their support many times because of China's humiliation by Japan). 

 

In other words, a "civil war" will be something forced on the law-abiding majority of Americans, who will be defending the Constitution and the legal order, just as they had to in 1861. 

 

The hard Left have got some very smart people at the top.  They are not so stupid as to casually throw  around the idea of an attempted coup by their side, a "civil war" initiated by them.  In any case, they don't have the firepower. They intend to use the firepower of the existing state.  They don't want to fight the militia -- they want American law enforcement and the military to do their job for them.

 

You have to read pretty deeply into the documents and history of the Left to understand their world-view, and why an anti-democratic seizure of power is, for the genuine Marxists among them, an absolutely standard, non-controversial idea .... but one which they have learned to hide.  They're not stupid.

 

So although the Left despise the majority of Americans, and wouldn't hesitate to impose a dictatorship on them -- this is the only way socialism can exist -- they are not fools. 

 

They know that everything they write is recorded somewhere and can be taken -- out of context or in context -- and used against them in a trial. (It happened to them seventy years ago. They haven't forgotten.) 

 

We have to be as smart as they are.

 

I personally feel the phrase "civil war" is a dangerous and unnecessary one, but if anyone is compelled to use it, please please please make it crystal clear that you are talking about something which is initiated by the other side, and not something which occurs because our side finds itself in a political minority in the US in the future, or doesn't like the outcome of a legal impeachment process, or a Supreme Court ruling.

 

Yes ... in superficial visual Hollywood terms, a group of citizens armed with serious weaponry and trained to execute light weapons infantry maneuvers, on the one hand, and the concepts of  Order, Legality, the Consittuion, on the other -- are counterposed.  In fact, in the long run, they are completely complementary.   Law requires Force behind it.

 

Just remember: everything which is posted on this board and on any other political board, is recorded permanently, and scanned and indexed for ready retreival by people who intend to use it as evidence against the militia movement in a future trial.  They have already, in a recent academic article, floated the idea of labelling the militia movement a "private army". And private armies are already illegal.

 

Don't believe me?  Look here: https://www.lawfareblog.com/armed-militias-are-taking-trumps-civil-war-tweets-seriously 

 

The difference between a lawless armed mob, and a real militia, is discipline.  In a voluntary movement, this comes down to self-discipline. 

 

Fire on command, not when you feel like it. This also applies to what you write and say.

 

 

Absolutely, I agree.  But, also read, I am advocating exhausting all options legally.  I'm already in there, it's wrong, just like this Police Officer who did no wrong and was persecuted and lynched with a left wing DA using her immunity to just terrorize him, make him a felon.  He committed NO CRIME, was afforded no defense, was setup by two defense attorney's we have in common who are now are going to be investigated with the evidence we have in violations of SCR guidelines by the Office of Lawyer Regulation who was very quick to respond when I brought the connection and SCR guidelines into play in the official complaint.

 

These abuses have been going on a very long time, and increasing in scale to the point, we accept what is normal those things that are not the norm in violation of our Constitution.  Courts are focused on men because it's not just a coup de etat going on against a President it against the Nation from the inside and the men must be out of the way, declared as felons, disarmed, even when these are not legit.  The United States is Under Siege by a outside force that has infiltrated over a long number of years and have hijacked all three branches of government in a concerted effort to overthrow.  This is very much like battle of the buldge, where you have a ideology and segment of people mixed in that believe in things worse than Napolean, Hitler, Stalin, Maou, right down to Satanism.  Then you have good people, some who are confused because of the hijacking of our systems like internet, media, so it's a mess.

 

If you read, while I use civil war I do state, it's cold and I also elaborate it is being brought about by government but it's a element in our midst forcing it on the legit people who adhere to our Nation's laws, Constitution, God, and are common sense.  The reality is, the biggest screw up these people made legally was to hijack the right to choice of who governs.  The legal ramifications mean, it doesn't matter if I am a felon, or your not a felon, or your a Constitutional militia or just a militia, the laws below the Constitution are rendered invalid, irrelevant, and no longer apply.  Your down to the basics, right back at 1776 at that point.  The Constitution is where you go, it's the backup redundancy, it's a face value document with no exceptions and somehow the laws under it, and their interpretations must be reformed.

 

In my writing, while I use Civil War, I state very specifically, you must exhaust all options.  One option, I am moving to employ in April is, you must openly admit the problem even if it costs you.  It has to be official, on record, because even a lower court, with a good judge, can turn this up and that would be very effective in thwarting what's going on if you have varying lower courts calling the ball on the laws.  My point is, I'm already in court, did i violate the laws, yeah, but it's a cycle of perpetual abuses by these hijackers in family, government over reach that has provoked me, I capitulated after so many years.  I mean, come on, the woman hauled off with my 15 year old state to state, I wouldn't go to court for the thousands I'd spend to chase her down I'd only get the bill, he's now TERMINALLY ill, my daughter was with held by my ex-wife after seeing her over half time for 8 and a half years, she was sent three letters demanding a response as to why she was being with held, you bet I blew my top.  I had no legal recourse, 2500.00 just to start a family case, then you go upwards to around 10 grand, I was already damaged by the VA for 6900.00.  The court should never have been in family anyways, it can't measure the issue, but it's in it because the laws have been hijacked and we are on flight 9/11 legally speaking.

 

So, what is to be said, except, at some point you just have to call the ball and I believe first, you fight this legally, judicially and one thing that hasn't been done is putting this all on official record legally, giving opportunity for the good elements in our court to fight up.  The big issue is fear, most the good ones know the truth, but, fear paralyzes.  I'm just going to be the one that demonstrates how you handle these people and the power of the truth, the supporter of someone in power even if it's lower to take action.  As I said, the law is not black and white like the judges robes.  Also, as I have studied law, what I have concluded is, it is the people that fix these issues, at the end of the day this judge hangs up the robes, goes home, kisses his wife, and he is the people to.  I happen to know he knows the truth or suspects and he really is "Out to make a difference."  So why is it he has been "Troubled" for twenty-two years as he stated to me in open court?  Well, it's fearful to stand up to these people, terrifying, I believe, firmly believe, if you find the right ones and set the example you can turn the course of events simply by courage and demonstration of a willingness to accept what ever consequences in order to ensure these things do not proceed on course.  It's called leadership, inspiring action and trying to cause it thru another route other than what "May" be coming.  Again Edward Gibbons - Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire, it wasn't the lunatics in power, the barbarians coming over the borders that brought Rome to it's knees it was when they began killing each other.  That's the reason they are pushing this so hard and why people are restraining themselves, even if they dont' know history, they can sense it and people are not stupid, they can do math.

 

I also will point out, haven't you gotten the message yet?  Anything you write, anything you say, anything you do, any organization attempt you make, any militia formed, any action is going to be deemed criminal, hateful, and thus, what you said above doesn't apply anymore.  Just face it, you either are going to state the truth and you will be attacked for it, demonized, persecuted or your silenced, muted, your loosing your guns soon and then it's done.  Your damned if you do, damned if you don't at this point so just accept that much and move on.  Don't be afraid to talk, write, speak, record and just accept there is nothing under the sun you do that is right that won't be assaulted. Any fight, Judically, verbally, or physically is going to be criminal even if its God given and authorized.

Edited by I3DI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I agree with you.

 

We can be absolutely completely 'clean', completely legal, and ... there are people on the Left, and perhaps in government, who will, nonetheless, go after us. These people don't care about truth, For them, the ends justify the means.

 

But ... we do not live in a communist-fascist dictatorship yet, not by a long chalk.  They will have to try us before a jury of our peers.  The American people are, by and large, very fair-minded, and that includes many liberals.  (Liberals are a dying breed, being replaced by 'progressives', who are not the same thing.) 

 

So ... we must be very careful not to give the enemy anything that they could use against us.  It's just wrong to say, "It doesn't matter, they'll get us anyway."   That's wrong.  We can win, but ... if we are careless about what we write or say, we will make it easier for the Left to destroy us.

 

Remember, it's not what you thought, it's not what you meant, it's what you actually said or wrote.  Everything we write on a forum like this, and much of what we say in public meetings, and some of what we say when we think we're just talking to a group of friends over a beer ... is being recorded and filed. 

 

Modern technology makes this very easy to do. (There is technology which can automatically translate voice-to-text, and then seach the text, automatically, for phrases like ;civil war', 'traitors', 'execute'.  You can be sure that's this is happening right now, even as you read this.) 

 

So we have got to be careful.  

 

And this is not just some tactical maneuver.  The United States was founded as a law-governed Constitutional Republic, where political differences are settled in an orderly manner.  It's the Left, in their horror-states, which rules by force. It's the backward Islamic societies where tribal militias run everything, and the law is ignored.  It's the Left, not us, who ultimately hate the idea of law and constitutional government, even if as a tactical measure, they are going to try to use it against us.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely correct Doug1943.  

 

And I have said many times whoever starts the war will ultimately end up loosing it.  Because they will be blamed for it and everything negative that happens in it regardless of who perpetrated it.  The one's that initiate the conflict will turn the fence sitters against them.  Those fence sitters will be needed for aid and support plus they are the ones who have to agree to the results of the conflict at it's conclusion.  Because if they don't it just sows the seeds of the follow-on conflict.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Doug1943 said:

Yes, I agree with you.

 

We can be absolutely completely 'clean', completely legal, and ... there are people on the Left, and perhaps in government, who will, nonetheless, go after us. These people don't care about truth, For them, the ends justify the means.

 

But ... we do not live in a communist-fascist dictatorship yet, not by a long chalk.  They will have to try us before a jury of our peers.  The American people are, by and large, very fair-minded, and that includes many liberals.  (Liberals are a dying breed, being replaced by 'progressives', who are not the same thing.) 

 

So ... we must be very careful not to give the enemy anything that they could use against us.  It's just wrong to say, "It doesn't matter, they'll get us anyway."   That's wrong.  We can win, but ... if we are careless about what we write or say, we will make it easier for the Left to destroy us.

 

Remember, it's not what you thought, it's not what you meant, it's what you actually said or wrote.  Everything we write on a forum like this, and much of what we say in public meetings, and some of what we say when we think we're just talking to a group of friends over a beer ... is being recorded and filed. 

 

Modern technology makes this very easy to do. (There is technology which can automatically translate voice-to-text, and then seach the text, automatically, for phrases like ;civil war', 'traitors', 'execute'.  You can be sure that's this is happening right now, even as you read this.) 

 

So we have got to be careful.  

 

And this is not just some tactical maneuver.  The United States was founded as a law-governed Constitutional Republic, where political differences are settled in an orderly manner.  It's the Left, in their horror-states, which rules by force. It's the backward Islamic societies where tribal militias run everything, and the law is ignored.  It's the Left, not us, who ultimately hate the idea of law and constitutional government, even if as a tactical measure, they are going to try to use it against us.

 

 

 

 

Agreed, but, just remember, this Roger Stone case sets the example for a jury of your peers.  Understand, in a court, the jury does not care about why, they are given specific instructions in trial and they either decide if you violated the law, or your didn't.    This means, all these non-legit laws on the books have been put on their so that in court you are a criminal and the laws are not in line with the highest laws anymore and you are a criminal, trial or no trial if you broke the law, you broke the law.  Juries do not decide matters of law.

 

With that in mind, your hope for just trials is gone.  I would have taken the jury trial option if the jury was given the option of deciding based on "Why".  That "Why" does not matter.  The lunatics are in power now and the laws are being written using judicial authority not granted in order to wrap you and I up.  Your legal recourse is gone as well as any hope of a just trial by jury.  The petition I am going to file addresses this very issue but, they are large in an charge and regardless of if it's legally accurate to the letter, at the top they will shoot it down and all the lower courts fall in line with the highest.  

 

While the American Public may be fair minded, once they sit on that jury and receive those instructions, just banish the thought you get a just trial because if the law is on the books and you broke it, your done for.  The laws on the books, by far, are non-constitutional, they are legislation made to breach your God given rights with one purpose and one purpose only, the same reason they have stolen elections, your conquest.  The laws at this time are mute, invalid, you can't tell me they were written by people I elected.  This is why things are in the state they are and before this is over, unless your in line with their plan which is, your a homosexual, pedophile, handing them your money, work, children to sit on some fat mans lap, baby murdering satanist, your a criminal.  That's where this is heading because its about elimination and the reason they are targeting boys, men, is because they must remove the men who protect, provide, and defend.  After that, it's free and open.  This is the purpose of all the Felonies, Gun Regulations, Exceptions to law that mute the inalienable rights you have they have no authority to do.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're still not seeing the bigger picture of what you are calling for.  The blinders have you focused 100% on your little piece of the problem and trying to use that as justification for what you constantly call for.  I think now the judge and your ex are correct in their assessments from what you have posted.

 

You still have your Freedom of Speech and are still free to use it.  But realize that what you say and do have consequences and unintended results as well as the ones you intend.  Trying to reason with you is useless.  Continue your rants as you see fit.  But I for one will not join your cause.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SecurityGuy42 said:

You're still not seeing the bigger picture of what you are calling for.  The blinders have you focused 100% on your little piece of the problem and trying to use that as justification for what you constantly call for.  I think now the judge and your ex are correct in their assessments from what you have posted.

 

You still have your Freedom of Speech and are still free to use it.  But realize that what you say and do have consequences and unintended results as well as the ones you intend.  Trying to reason with you is useless.  Continue your rants as you see fit.  But I for one will not join your cause.

Fair enough.  I'm actually agreeing with you on what your saying, just pointing out the obvious.  I'm also not calling for anything other than efforts to change this with the higher laws thru speaking.  As the senator in Congress stated, guns come last.  You even have a senator in Congress addressing this very issue, they are pushing "Civil War".  I have the whole speech.  What he is doing is pretty audacious and it's verbally making known, "Hey, this is really going to far here."  Problem is, Congress, the Senate, the Executive are not the place where the problem resides.  It's the legal system.  The judicial branch is the most powerful branch because all things start and end with law in a civilized nation.  Really, some how, despite the fact the laws have been hijacked to make law a matter of profit not principal, got to get this into court and try to win the good ones in the judicial system to start fighting the hijackers up top legally.  

 

You'll hate me for saying it, but, you wouldn't join anything when it comes down to brass tax.  Your the problem actually, your own worse enemy.  You don't know how things work in court.  You don't care to know how things actually work or how this is really being used against you.  You want to play soldier, you want to talk good about how your rights matter, but you wouldn't put any muscle behind it because it would cost you.  If you did, it would be out of self preservation and you would never have tried anything prior to that to prevent it because you were adhering to that, "I might get in trouble.  It's being cataloged." as if it matters.  These people, your in trouble no matter how much law you follow, and the legal system, it's rules don't change because people are fair minded.  Your already a criminal, and your already down to brass tax.  You just want to butt heads and be a keyboard warrior and find fault with peoples actions.  You want others to pay the price so you can be all cushy and safe.  You've already been sent the message from up top in three different cases now, Trump, Roger Stone, November 12th Supreme Court Ruling. You have been sent the message 3 years, they are drooling over your children, how they are going to kill you, torture you, ship you off to prison camps and retrain you.  They stacked jury already, they will do the same to you as well.  Your the guy that is on here now claiming fair minded Americans will sit on juries, you'll have your day in court, the sky is "Red", but I say "Sky is Blue", you won't get that.  What your going to get is removed, by force, because they already have you by the short hairs and you are ignorant, or refuse to accept the truth when it's in front of you.

 

Sorry if that hurt, but truth usually does.  We're going down because you are the majority.  All talk, couldn't face reality if it kissed you in the face, the last minutes of America, it's hell on earth!  I love it.

 

Anyways, God Bless, we can agree to disagree I guess.

 

Edited by I3DI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You see, everybody's right. It's a question of emphasis.  I have reason to believe that some legally-trained people on the Left are planning to wage 'Lawfare' against the militia movement in the fairly near future, by invoking the prohibition against "private armies". 

 

There is no perfect justice in this world.  But there is still imperfect justice, and sometimes even justice.  If we think we shall always be defeated in court, we will either be careless, or will retreat to our private lives.  First Corinthians 14:8: "If the trumpet giveth  an uncertain sound, who will prepare himself to the battle?" 

 

Juries exonerated George Zimmerman. They exonerated Darren Wilson, who defended himself from the thug Michael Brown (now exalted by Elizabeth Warren as a poor innocent victim of white racism). Don't give up on your fellow Americans!!!

 

Most people DO have a sense of 'fairness' -- it's the one human universal that anthropologists have discovered that seems to be present -- weakly! -- in all human groups.  So even unjust laws can be challenged.

And until we live under an open dictatorship -- a Nazi Germany or Communist Russia sort of situation -- we have to take advantage of whatever exists in the way of laws and fair play.

 

In the meantime, and not to change the subject -- the most important mission of the militia, it seems to me, is to grow, grow, grow. Avoiding appearing like crazy maniacs is important not just to avoid attacks from enemies, but also to be able to appeal to the next layer of people who ought to be joining the militia movement.

 

Who are they?  Among others,  veterans, retired law enforcement, gun-owners, and people who believe in law and order and the Constitution (who will mainly be Republicans but will also include some traditional Democrats.)   There are probably several tens of thousands of potential recruits from the latest generation of young people who have 'taken the red pill', and are repulsed by the insane direction the Politically Correct Left are taking.  I don't know how militia groups try to recruit, but I would expect that fertile ground would found in churches, VFW and American Legion posts, and among conservative political groups.

 

Now a lot of these people are naturally 'conservative', in the personal sense. Radicalism, extremism, of the Right, is as unappealing as radicalism of the Left. It's no accident that the hard Left and their creatures in the mass media try their best to portray the milita movement as gun-toting crazies eager for a shoot-out with authority.  That image has to be countered.

 

The next layer of recruits for the militia movement are ordinary, decent, patriotic Americans. These people need to be approached in a low-key way, in my opinion. Not  "Join us in preparation for fighting a bloody civil war that the Left is preparing for" -- even though this may well be true!!!  -- but, at the moment, "Join us to make sure your neighborhood is fully prepared for any emergency that could arise, including one where traditional law enforcement is not able to protect us".   In other words, joining a local milita group means getting trained in group defense -- it doesn't mean you're going to be on your way to occupy Federal property in Oregon or having a stand-off with the FBI. 

 

A single gun-owner can prevent a home invasion by one or two felons, but to deter a 'neighborhood invasion' by several hundred doped-up armed looters requires the sort of organization, division of labor, and preparation that a well=regulated militia can provide, because the police may not be there.  This has already happened:

 

It's a kind of social insurance. Just in case Elizabeth Warren and people who think like her come to power in the future, and send a message to the police that if a member of a favored minority smashes you in the face and tries to grab your gun, runs away, and then turns and comes at you .... you just have to take it, otherwise you're a white racist.  This is the message that will possibly be coming from a future President of the US -- what effect will that have on policemen?  Having a group of trained, armed, responsble citizens available to defend their neighborhoods is just common sense. Show a few videos of Ferguson Missouri in flames, after it was targetted by Leftists from all over the United States, to see what is in our future.

 

[Note: even the liberals of VOX magazine were surprised by Warren (and Harris') endorsement of the would-be cop-killer Michael Brown: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/8/12/20801975/elizabeth-warren-kamala-harris-michael-brown-ferguson-tweets).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/18/2019 at 11:50 AM, I3DI said:

You'll hate me for saying it, but, you wouldn't join anything when it comes down to brass tax.  Your the problem actually, your own worse enemy.

FYI, I am a US Army veteran who was well into my double digits when I retired.  I have multiple tours overseas (no, not Germany) to include the Big Litter Box.  I have already proven I will accept whatever self-sacrifice is required of me and more than willing to make my enemies pay their ultimate price.  The problem is hot heads rushing into things not thinking about the consequences.

 

A parable for you to ponder, everyone knows it:

Two bulls are up on a hill looking over their pasture.  The young one spies a group of cows grazing below.  He turns to the older one and says, " lets run down there and f**k one of them cows!"  The older one turns to the younger one and says, "no, let's walk down there and f**k them all."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a good friend who is a year younger then I am who has been duped most of his life and only woke up about three-years ago. Ever since then he tends to get a little pissy about others like us "NOT DOING ENOUGH " and "THEY ARE ALL TALK NO ACTION" , "WE NEED TO MARCH ON D.C. OR JUST SHUT UP", yadda yadda yadda ...... you getthe point and you might have seen his rants on similar boards . YET .... he will not do any actual studying on subjects that I keep pointing out to him , he has the money but will not invest in any quality equipment and food storage . He keeps making excuses as to why not he hasn't learned how to field strip his weapons blind folded yet and reassemble them in the field because ..."That's not going to make us free so I'm not going to waste my time ." ..... that kinda crap.

But he sure will show off his abbs if given the chance and exclaim how he is "training" while everyone else is just sitting on their asses doing nothing .

I keep trying to get across to him that there is more at play then what he wants to be bothered with learning , that this systemic rot is global and that until the balloon goes up all that we can do is continue to do what we can until we are forced to up the ante .

 

I keep telling him that most newbies who spent their whole lives up until they RED PILL all seem to react that same way at some point when they think that everything can just be fixed over a long weekend and that is all that it will take to set everything straight and blame all of us for not fixing it for them already.

 

I now just tell him when he gets like this that he is going to die alone with that attitude because it's his own fault that he is not working on Team Building and Self Education , and to only text me again when he is done with his " lil'b***h whining " as I'm done hearing it . I've been involved for about 35-years now and I've seen plenty of his kind "come-and-go-and-blame-us-for-there-kind-of-failings" yadda yadda yadda .......

And then he works his knot out for a few days and is back to being a good friend .....until..... wash/rinse/repeat.....

 

The OP sounds like a longer winded version of what I already hear , and Sir I will tell you this , unless you are willing to actually LEARN from others who KNOW MORE then you , you are only causing more HARM then GOOD and need to put your individual house in order before you continue to rant about others not making things better for you.

 

Like I tell my friend ..... Life's tough Buttercup , better get a helmet and learn to soldier on..."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Pastor Mike said:

I have a good friend who is a year younger then I am who has been duped most of his life and only woke up about three-years ago. Ever since then he tends to get a little pissy about others like us "NOT DOING ENOUGH " and "THEY ARE ALL TALK NO ACTION" , "WE NEED TO MARCH ON D.C. OR JUST SHUT UP", yadda yadda yadda ...... you getthe point and you might have seen his rants on similar boards . YET .... he will not do any actual studying on subjects that I keep pointing out to him , he has the money but will not invest in any quality equipment and food storage . He keeps making excuses as to why not he hasn't learned how to field strip his weapons blind folded yet and reassemble them in the field because ..."That's not going to make us free so I'm not going to waste my time ." ..... that kinda crap.

But he sure will show off his abbs if given the chance and exclaim how he is "training" while everyone else is just sitting on their asses doing nothing .

I keep trying to get across to him that there is more at play then what he wants to be bothered with learning , that this systemic rot is global and that until the balloon goes up all that we can do is continue to do what we can until we are forced to up the ante .

 

I keep telling him that most newbies who spent their whole lives up until they RED PILL all seem to react that same way at some point when they think that everything can just be fixed over a long weekend and that is all that it will take to set everything straight and blame all of us for not fixing it for them already.

 

I now just tell him when he gets like this that he is going to die alone with that attitude because it's his own fault that he is not working on Team Building and Self Education , and to only text me again when he is done with his " lil'b***h whining " as I'm done hearing it . I've been involved for about 35-years now and I've seen plenty of his kind "come-and-go-and-blame-us-for-there-kind-of-failings" yadda yadda yadda .......

And then he works his knot out for a few days and is back to being a good friend .....until..... wash/rinse/repeat.....

 

The OP sounds like a longer winded version of what I already hear , and Sir I will tell you this , unless you are willing to actually LEARN from others who KNOW MORE then you , you are only causing more HARM then GOOD and need to put your individual house in order before you continue to rant about others not making things better for you.

 

Like I tell my friend ..... Life's tough Buttercup , better get a helmet and learn to soldier on..."

I stayed away from Law.  I hated it.  It was a political weapon, shady, and I am very direct, blunt, honest.  I realize that was the wrong move.  The last 2 years since my case began I have studied law.  I have taken my software skills and am focused on saving only genuine, good, Constitutional lawyers money by hosting them, protecting them in the tech field, developing their sites at nearly 1/8th the cost.  I am starting my second attorney today recommended by the first, very good, gun strapping one I won over and he called me the other day, "I am just absolutely in love with the site. Thank you."  I have studied law for two years, I am putting up two AT-FACE petitions and despite the crud up top I will be getting right in their faces with the violations on non subjective, non-speculative arguments in Constitutional challenges.  

 

A police officer of 14 years and veteran I am representing him in circuit court, Pro Se.  He was lynched in short.  All I will say.  I am helping him pay for his appeal.  I am using his case as one example case out of several in the petitions.

 

What I am saying is, you are absolutely right.  I am right to.  We have to know what we don't want.  In circuit court I am going to be representing this man in front of the same judge on my case.  My friend said, "Stay as far away from that judge as possible."  I say, "Not a chance, I am getting right up in his kisser."  I know the answer here and I would never tell anyone to do something I am unwilling to do.  I love your points.  

 

Do me a favor.  If you know any lawyers, good, Constitutional, genuine, not robbing the public, man hating, police hating, veteran hating crud, because I will vet them, send them my way.

 

I did this site:

 

http://millerlaw.law

 

I did the video, flaming text, whole kaboodle.  My monthly is 19.95.  I charge 100.00 for the video work, 50 for logo redo, then the standard URL fee and SSL fee.  I charge annually only.  Most these lawyers are paying 200.00 a month for rental crap.  My clients own the sites I do and receive the backups, and they are managed by me.  I own the serve and the jurisdiction is in the U.S.  I get to select the equipment and build of the servers.

 

God Bless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Who Viewed the Topic

    13 members have viewed this topic:

Follow: @My_Militia

Mission Statement

As the de facto authority in american patriot militias we understand that we oversee a significant share of the publics perception of the militia, and with this many individuals and militias entrust their ideas, work, and data to our platform. We do not take this lightly as we mandate an extreme amount of responsibility and assurance of good faith, transparency, and due process. We will remain vigilant as a trusted force among our people. So help us God.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Your Privacy Is Important To Us Learn More: Privacy Policy