Jump to content
LetFreedomRing

Joe Biden Says You Need More Than The 2nd Amendment To Fight A Tyrannical Government

Recommended Posts

Yeah, this is a common argument these days from that end of the political spectrum.  The assumption is faulty in that they assume that the military will not fracture in the event of a civil or revolutionary war.  It is also faulty in that only an absolute moron would nuke their own country in order to stop any form of an uprising... not only do both sides lose in such a case... so does the entire globe.  

 

I always point to the insurgents in the Middle East, as much as I despise them, as an example of how flawed their argument is regarding armed civilians not being able to fight back against a large military force.  After 18 years against the U.S. and coalition forces... and about 10 years before that against the Soviets... the camel fluffers are still around.  

 

Biden's talking points sound rational to people who have no knowledge about history or the human spirit (whether for good or evil) to endure and persist in the face of incredible odds.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, LetFreedomRing said:

Joe Biden Says You Need More Than The 2nd Amendment To Fight A Tyrannical Government

 

My reply would be, Maybe so but, it is a great starting point.

 

The entire leftist line up for the Nov run this year is a joke. Everyone knows it is a joke. Well except maybe the candidates themselves, I would really love to ask Bloomberg right now, how it feels to piss away so much money knowing he doesn't have a snow balls chance in hell of getting elected.   What I do not get though with the glorious days of Obama, if those 8 glorious years of hope and change were so fantastic, exactly why didn't the leftists win with Hillary , Trump shouldn't of stood a chance. Everyone on the left should of been tingling off of obama and just danced on in with Hillary.  History with the clintons be damned . An then if Hillarys plans were too poor to get behind then exactly why did the same voters vote Obama in for a second term ( which is rather rhetorical as to why  least for me ).

 

I know there is the possibility Trump could lose. An that would be a real nightmare if he did. So deff going to show up to vote for Trump in Nov, but I am more concerned on where Congress is heading after that, and what is to come after Trump, are we going to get another Carter, Clinton, Obama, or something worse. Or another great conservative .  Or a terrible ass kissing republican. An then 8 years of fixing the mess of obama , just falls apart and we start all over.

 

 

An sadly, Biden is sort of right about needing more than the 2nd amendment  against a tyrannical gov, but probably not in the way he thought. A real fight against a Tyrannical gov, like the Nazi Regime or North Korea or these factions in the  Middle East that are run by Mullahs, takes financial backing by allies , and lots of resources and commitment from them as well. And top knotch military leaders that have a spine. An really political leaders with a bigger spine to help fight back such tyrants and help restore freedom.

 

What ever biden thinks is needed who knows, but then again I would be surprised if Biden knows what time of day it is at any given point. Let alone knowing wtf he is actually talking about.

Edited by GLCsector3295

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

     I'd still like to know why the price of ammo has quadrupled since 1992, why the manufacturers have bowed the knee to the Leftist elements of the government. Who are they really working for? The Socialists? Their greedy selves?

     In 1992 you could buy a 500 count brick of .22 catridges for $5-$7, a box of 30-30 cartridges, reloads, 20 count I think, for $6-$7. The cost of supplies couldn't have went up that much, and definitely not overnight.

     And that dilemma has to do with everything, not just ammo. Why is it that Congress won't even consider the proposal by one Congressman to do the flat tax, I think it's called, which would supposedly erase the deficit, obliterate the national debt and put more money into the taxpayers' pockets, all the while not hurting other things?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/18/2020 at 6:35 PM, Todd A. Slee said:

     We need more attorneys like this gal, and one like her as attorney general or something:

 

Fracking Electoral College, I actually went and got a dumbed down version of the US Constitution > For Dummies > gives really good detailed reasoning and answers for the 5 W's , In it, It dives into the Electoral college. An it may be mentioned here in this video I didn't watch ( Yet ) but fun fact, ANY STATE include DEMOCRAT held states, can split the electoral votes. Only 2 states so far split votes. So, maybe the question should be if the democrats want every vote to really count, why the hell do they not split the votes in the their states, so each party gets a fair shake.

 

With only 2 states doing this, I can't see any others joining suit any time soon. Any how we all know it isn't the Electoral College that is the problem. It is the Democrat Party as (a hole, pun intended )  that are sore losers, like a child with no social skills or manners, or anything, you lose, you scream foul, you kick and scream and cry, and then run home and tell your parents. Except now, they run to lawyers and the media and demand to find a way to erase a part of the system they cant control.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/18/2020 at 12:42 PM, wquon said:

this may help shed some light on IF we can...

 

Interesting, so I guess the lesson to learn here, is that if Iran ever wants a snow balls chance in hell to defeat the USA, they need to hire a retired Marine General, or at least this one.

 

That and I am almost certain that the US Military is running these simulation war games on that board game Risk.  sitting around a table, smoking cigars, making explosion noises and drinking scotch. 

Edited by GLCsector3295

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are for sure running these types of simulations. They used to do it during the cold war to run what if situations during the cold war. I did watch the video about the General and thought it was interesting. Some points in it made sense in how we do seem to rely perhaps a little too much into modern technology and miss that blind spot where simple non high tech solutions could easily defeat all the cool toys. 

 Here is an example, aluminum was accidentally dumped on a power sub station by an overhead aircraft and it shorted out power for a time. The military later used this for other uses for their purposes. It still amazes me how simple things if though about can be used like this.

  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GLCsector3295 said:

Interesting, so I guess the lesson to learn here, is that if Iran ever wants a snow balls chance in hell to defeat the USA, they need to hire a retired Marine General, or at least this one.

 

That and I am almost certain that the US Military is running these simulation war games on that board game Risk.  sitting around a table, smoking cigars, making explosion noises and drinking scotch. 

no. the jist is; it is not out of reach for the "average" citizen to defend ourselves against the military.

 

we probably wont have to, but thats another topic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/20/2020 at 2:11 PM, wquon said:

no. the jist is; it is not out of reach for the "average" citizen to defend ourselves against the military.

 

we probably wont have to, but thats another topic.

I pretty much disagree with that because these " average citizens " were Iranians lead by this Ret, Marine General in a hypothetical situation. Take that same situation and take out that particular retired General, and remove any leadership whatsoever with any real education, and see how far they get.

 

The Middle East does a good job at thwarting the US Military, Heck Afghanistan had the upper hand on Russia for a long time but that was really only because of the backing of the USA, Well they were doing good on their own for a while an then the USA gave support.  But I think the truth is with out proper leadership, funding, and resources it would be extremely hard to fight a well trained,led, and funded military.

 

Anyhow the middle east is going to be a gold mine for generations to come because the war machine needs to keep being fed. too many people need the conflict ( pick ones problem in the middle east ) to keep going for so many reasons.

 

But no way in hell do i believe on a good day that Iran can beat the US Military,  one quick Nuclear strike and Iran is done, with out one foot solider ever touching their soil. It would start WW3, but Iran would be off the table.

 

Infact someone get them to run that simulation, one Nuclear strike on Iran, see who is left standing to fight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...