Jump to content

The Left will kill half this country if they need to.


Recommended Posts

The left has so much to lose this election they're willing to do literally anything include deconstruct the country itself  through street warfare and even coordinating and colluding with nations like China.. They will do absolutely anything, anything whatsoever,  to prevent Trump's 2nd term. 

 

The reason being,  the alternative to a Biden Presidency looks like this:

 

* Obama, the first black President, charming, erudite, and appealing  is also found to be 10x more corrupt than Nixon. He may not go to jail, in fact, he won't, but it will be established for a fact that he subverted and used the intelligence agencies of the United States to illegally spy on, undermine and then try to eject from office his party's political rival. That's banana republic level shit and  Ii's the one thing above all others they can't let happen: Obama's reputation ruined to history. They'll kill half this country  to make sure that alone doesn't happen. 

 

* Clinton spends the rest of her life being investigated and sued, She has perhaps 10 more years to live before her health collapses and every second of  that time is going to be spent thinking about her lawyers and trying to avoid the circus  court appearances would unleash. Another ruined reputation, with 100% certainity. The entire party is going to collapse. 

 

* Biden disappears from public view 6 months after his loss and it is later shown that he is suffering from the begininning stages of senile dementia.  This will mean that the Democrats engaged in what is effectivvely elder abuse throughout the 2020 election which in turns confirms their own diagnosis: psychopathy. 

 

* The implosion of the societal influence of the tech billionaires. Google broken up. FB and Twitter forced to carry anything which is also legal without discrimination upon pain of criminal prosecution and corporate dissolution.  Possibly FB broken up and Twitter turned into a public utility ala ATT. 

 

* New legal thinking about what constitutes a crime when the number of people impacted runs into the tens of millions, as is the case with the Tech Tyrants. The sheer quanity of people being effected by their malfaesance becomes its own quality, changing the seriousness of the crime and making some new things  criminal owing only to the sheer scope, magnitude  and impact of that which is now being  criminalized.

 

* The defunding not of the police but of the university system which is at this point is essentially a 50 year-old  financial scam against the middle class,  a grifter's paradise, and a factory for producing non-critcal thinkers and  people jacked up for the violent overthrow of the United States of America, all  footed by the US taxpayer. Its outright full throated assault on science and reason itself if left unchecked will destroy our society. Big L Liberal and tolerant societies are not required, by dint of being tolerant, to also nuture their own destruction .

 

* The break up of the CIA, which  has already been brought under command of  Homeland Security. The excuse?  Things are being reorganized and their functions are being redistributed . The real reason? They participated in an attempted coup d'etat against the President of the United States of America. 

 

It's the total destruction of all their power bases, reputation and legitimacy, all at once. 

 

So I mean it when I say they'll kill half this nation to stay in power. The mass voter fraud they're engineering is nothing to them.

 

Be prepared people. It's coming and it will be like nothing this nation has EVER seen. 

Edited by MarcusAurelius
  • Like 4
  • Hello 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

NOTE:

The post that this pot below was a reaction to was deleted by its original author, who recently joined (a week ago) and had zero previous posts:

 

 

The reason you couldn't form any orignal rejoinder to my post, but instead had to copy and paste it, changing a few words here and there, exactly goes to the problem at hand: the Left has abandoned the practice of critical, original thinking as an activity. They have specifically  targeted reason itself as a " tool of white oppression".  They're not just incapable of original thought, they affirmatively despise it and they despise anyone capable of it.

 

In fact, they despise anyone capable, period.  Violent, rabid hatred of anyone  successful, even in a small way, is one of the chief motivating forces of the Left.

 

That is why mere equality under the law isn't good enough for them anymore- they need equity, which is equality of outcome.

 

The reason for that is, they're miserable, serial failures,  and, as the mugshots of antifa show, much more ugly than just chance would predict. They're failures at the task of being alive and making their way, and they know it, so they demand that everything simply be given to them.   

 

What we're seeing in Portland and Seattle and NYC and elsewhere is a mass aggregate of low functioning  narcissistic  borderline personalities who are attempting to get their way the same way a toddler does- by screaming and breaking things and threats.

 

Their narcissism is the reason they  refuse to engage or even know their opponent's arguments and  is also the reason it never registers with them that dressing in a uniform and descending on innocent people, shrieking at them, demanding  that those people  say what they tell those people to say and that those people perform their movement's salute is not just not eeirly similar to what the Nazis did,  it's  exactly what the Nazis did.

 

Their borderline personality  is why it never occurs to them that smashing the windows of store fronts as a way of  intimidating a specific, targeted  population  followed by demands for absolute political control is not just eeirly similar to what the Nazis did, it's exactly what the Nazis did. 

 

10% of the population has an IQ at or below 85. That means 10% of the population is functioning at such a low level the army cannot find any task for which they can be relied upon, no matter how trivial, and consequently they are forbidden to join. 15% of the population has an IQ of 90 or below and that means they are functioning at such a low level they may not  learn to read well enough to  function as an independent adult in civilian society.

 

In a population of 330 million Those are huge numbers- almost 50 million people. A large number of those people also suffer from narcissism, sociopathy and psychopathy and are consequently  susceptible to  malicious prodding by the Left which incites them to be jealous, covetous and believe they are losing in life not because it's an even playing field and they are less capable but  because some other group has rigged  the game against them and that other group must be destroyed. 

 

 

This is exactly what Communism and and the Left always does; it identifies  the one source of medical, scientific and material progress in a society- the independently minded, productive and capable people- and targets them for personal destruction.

 

Thus the famines in the USSR. Thus the famines in Communist China. Thus PolPot in Cambodia and Marduro in Venezuela and antifa in Portland.  Thus the gulags and re-education camps and the mass killings of last century at collectivist's hands- last tolled at 150 million people. 150 million people all murdered, starved and worked to death because of a single Utopian vision named collectivism, Socialism, Communism. 

 

At some point it has to become apparent to everyone that collectivism is a disease. Not an idea, but a mind parasite which takes over its host and drives it to destroy its own society. At some point society is simply going to say no more genocide, no more concentration camps, no more mass murder, just..... no more. 

 

We don't  need to wait any longer for the results of this repeated  experiment we've run over a century now- the results  are  in and the same every time.   It's a dangerous disease of the mind and we have to  crush once and for all or we simply won't survive as a species. 

 

Get ready. It's coming. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by MarcusAurelius
  • Like 1
  • Winner 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

@ SavetheRepublic  forgetting everything else you just said, the only thing that really got under my skin is your horribly misconstrued interpretation of the militia in the eyes of the founders. The militia and the national guard are completely separate entities, in form and function. They are what the founding fathers called a "select militia" which they attributed to being the same as a standing army, and was widely despised. Go read the militia act of 1792, and tell me that the founders were trying to create the guard. On the contrary, the national guard was LITERALLY created to DESTROY the standing militia system. The guard was created in 1903 under the dick act, an appropriate title, to "update" the militia. This was about the same time you had socialists start taking power. In what way did they "update" the militia? What else, they turned it into the every thing the founders warned us about. A standing army. And even better for them, this standing army, which is also an offshoot of the regular military FYI, can be deployed much more freely on American soil, unlike the regular army. One more thing i should mention, while the militia was historically under the control of the president, who was all the commander of the military, the militia was not under the control of the military. In practice, they were akin to different branches. Unlike the guard who can be readily put under direct military command. The founders knew the PEOPLE had to be armed, to keep this nation free. How do people fight, not governments? They form private or local militias. Governments fight with military's or police forces, see the Irish war for independence, or Northern Ireland for an example of the latter.  Also, the term well regulated means something different today than it did 200 years ago, back then, it simply meant to function properly, not, to be subject to strict government regulation. Learn your history, before you repeat it like an Asshole.

  • Like 1
  • 'Merica 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, young patriot said:

@ SavetheRepublic  forgetting everything else you just said, the only thing that really got under my skin is your horribly misconstrued interpretation of the militia in the eyes of the founders. The militia and the national guard are completely separate entities, in form and function. They are what the founding fathers called a "select militia" which they attributed to being the same as a standing army, and was widely despised. Go read the militia act of 1792, and tell me that the founders were trying to create the guard. On the contrary, the national guard was LITERALLY created to DESTROY the standing militia system. The guard was created in 1903 under the dick act, an appropriate title, to "update" the militia. This was about the same time you had socialists start taking power. In what way did they "update" the militia? What else, they turned it into the every thing the founders warned us about. A standing army. And even better for them, this standing army, which is also an offshoot of the regular military FYI, can be deployed much more freely on American soil, unlike the regular army. One more thing i should mention, while the militia was historically under the control of the president, who was all the commander of the military, the militia was not under the control of the military. In practice, they were akin to different branches. Unlike the guard who can be readily put under direct military command. The founders knew the PEOPLE had to be armed, to keep this nation free. How do people fight, not governments? They form private or local militias. Governments fight with military's or police forces, see the Irish war for independence, or Northern Ireland for an example of the latter.  Also, the term well regulated means something different today than it did 200 years ago, back then, it simply meant to function properly, not, to be subject to strict government regulation. Learn your history, before you repeat it like an Asshole.

 

I just smoked SavetheRepublic's account as a spammer, they were a communist infiltrator and agitator.

  • Like 5

"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.” ― Mark Twain

"I prefer dangerous FREEDOM over peaceful SLAVERY" -Thomas Jefferson

“Freedom is not a gift bestowed upon us by other men, but a right that belongs to us by the laws of God and nature.” -Benjamin Franklin

"Si vis pacem para bellum" / "If you want peace, prepare for war" - Every wise warrior there ever was.

 

lfr.jpg.91d35fb0dbad2fa6e5cc5b2544ce55d5.jpg

 

lfr.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, young patriot said:

@ SavetheRepublic  forgetting everything else you just said, the only thing that really got under my skin is your horribly misconstrued interpretation of the militia in the eyes of the founders. The militia and the national guard are completely separate entities, in form and function. They are what the founding fathers called a "select militia" which they attributed to being the same as a standing army, and was widely despised. Go read the militia act of 1792, and tell me that the founders were trying to create the guard. On the contrary, the national guard was LITERALLY created to DESTROY the standing militia system. The guard was created in 1903 under the dick act, an appropriate title, to "update" the militia. This was about the same time you had socialists start taking power. In what way did they "update" the militia? What else, they turned it into the every thing the founders warned us about. A standing army. And even better for them, this standing army, which is also an offshoot of the regular military FYI, can be deployed much more freely on American soil, unlike the regular army. One more thing i should mention, while the militia was historically under the control of the president, who was all the commander of the military, the militia was not under the control of the military. In practice, they were akin to different branches. Unlike the guard who can be readily put under direct military command. The founders knew the PEOPLE had to be armed, to keep this nation free. How do people fight, not governments? They form private or local militias. Governments fight with military's or police forces, see the Irish war for independence, or Northern Ireland for an example of the latter.  Also, the term well regulated means something different today than it did 200 years ago, back then, it simply meant to function properly, not, to be subject to strict government regulation. Learn your history, before you repeat it like an Asshole.

Don't you just love it (and the logic of it) when the left uses the 2nd to "prove" that the militia is only legitimate when it is controlled by the government or under the wing of the military, and that only the military and militia should be allowed to own guns? The circular reasoning involved is so convoluted and inward facing, it feels like you are seeing the formulation of a black hole.

Edited by MarcS
  • Cool 1
  • Winner 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, LetFreedomRing said:

 

I just smoked SavetheRepublic's account as a spammer, they were a communist infiltrator and agitator.

It's funny how the Resistance Warriors who speak up are almost always "new guys" and how they stand out even when (unlike this fool) they try to blend in and sound reasonable and rational. Obviously this guy was a sacrificial lamb, intended to be here only briefly. Makes you wonder how many silent watchers they have though, doesn't it? Might be that part of this fool's purpose was to let the silent watchers identify patriots who spoke up and got hooked by this fool's nonsense. We know they use a variation on this exact tactic in their street level actions.

  • Like 1
  • Winner 1
  • 'Merica 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MarcusAurelius said:

Si vis pacem para bellum

 

This. 

 

Part of my personal way of life and philosophy.  I live it daily brother.

 

This is another favorite of mine:

image.png

 

  • Like 1
  • Winner 2

"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.” ― Mark Twain

"I prefer dangerous FREEDOM over peaceful SLAVERY" -Thomas Jefferson

“Freedom is not a gift bestowed upon us by other men, but a right that belongs to us by the laws of God and nature.” -Benjamin Franklin

"Si vis pacem para bellum" / "If you want peace, prepare for war" - Every wise warrior there ever was.

 

lfr.jpg.91d35fb0dbad2fa6e5cc5b2544ce55d5.jpg

 

lfr.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Use of this site is confirmation and acceptance of your understanding of our Terms of Use , Privacy Policy and site Guidelines . We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.