Jump to content
  • Welcome to My Militia!

    As a citizen of the United States, you are a member of the Constitutionally guaranteed unorganized militia. 

    Everything you have heard about militias from the media is likely wrong. Main stream news has primarily reported on the negative stereotypes and criminal activity of groups that have nothing to do with militia. The true militia has exactly the opposite purpose; to uphold the law and the Constitution.  

    We are a growing community of Americans that believe that the supreme laws of our Constitution must be diligently protected and upheld. Fostering the lawful rebirth of State militia is a crucial step in preserving the Republic. 

    You are currently viewing the site as a guest which gives you limited access. Please take a moment to join our community and you will join thousands of members with access to special features. Registration is easy and free and carries no obligation. 

About This Militia

Kansas Allied Patriots is a coalition of Kansan patriots working together to secure Kansas as well as improve our personal capabilities and preparedness. Actively recruiting and highly responsive. https://www.mymilitia.com/forums/topic/63174-kansas-allied-patriots/?tab=comments#comment-88529

Loyalty Oath - By joining our unit you hereby confirm you will abide to and be bound by the following oath...

I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey my morals and act as the steward of my state and protector of my family.
  1. What's new in this militia
  2. until

    I think I responded, but don't remember. So I am double checking. It will be myself and my better half. We will not be there for lunch, and are looking to arrive ~1230.
  3. until

    is anyone seeing this page???
  4. Then there is no issue, we all fall within Kansas, which we both identify as the 34th field force. We are going under the lightfoot model unless a majority of our members vote to repeal the vote they just had that is what we will do. Also your unit dosent show up on AWRM which was one of the first places i looked to reach out. I dont mean to be a dick but i am confused on how this involves our discord. KAP is a networking group for Kansas, and lightfoot forces in Kansas are not the only group welcome here, just the people who were wanting to get active, many of whom had been searching for years voted to form a unit under the lightfoot model. I am confused on the issue of designation as if we are separate groups then so long as one group dosent claim to be the other there is no reason for there to be issues. The oldest active modern militia group i found is the Missouri Militia established in 1982. Our model may have synced up with similar regs and organization suggestions which to me is a good thing as it simplifies identifying units within a states area and is a good identifier for networking.
  5. Not sure what makes you think I'm upset about anything.
  6. Also the AWRM site says feel free to use the system just alter it which the lightfoot did do. You even mentioned you guys borrowed it as well and altered it. Also lightfoot uniforms do not show the FF number or anything like that. Just lightfoot patches with a state patch. You also admitted to how you came up with the state number which is an awesome way that many can think of. Not trying to be rude just not really seeing why your upset about something that 2 websites state any group can borrow and asks if we do borrow it that we alter it.
  7. You can list your group on the Militia Page under Kansas Militias.
  8. Our group doesn't have a model, we formed our own. We adopted the National Militia Standards and went from there with bylaws and such. We developed SOPs for various aspects, such as medical, those under arms, auxiliary, as well as AOs and so on. We wanted to keep everything local and form relationships only with other units within our immediate geological region. We felt it was more logical to associate ourselves, training wise and such, with local people/groups. We have limited this to a 5 county area, however, we do have a 'sister unit' outside this range in case we must leave. We have trained with them and keep tabs on each other, yet stay out of each other's hair, neither unit trieds to impose its rules and regs on the other, basically - "tow our line or leave" philosophy. Years ago we tried to organize 2 large groups, along with 2 smaller groups, into one homogeneous group covering the 5 county area - it did not work and all 4 groups disintegrated. This is the reason we will not 'join' other groups under a single 'model'. We have no problem helping others create units for their AO, but once that's done they're are independent. We will retain ties, and even train with them, but will not expect them to follow our model. A couple things we created SOPs for, that we have encouraged others to consider, are for 'assests' and 'liabilities'. Examples... some farmers/ranchers, water works, etc are assets that need to be protected, as well as specific individuals. Some liabilities would include bridges (vehicle and rail) and communications towers. We have developed lists of these assets and liabilities, with ways to deal with them as needs be. Also, we don't really allow people to join our group that don’t live within our immediate AO - about a 25 to 30 mile radius, if that (there are some exceptions though). Any bigger and you can get over extended. If their is a lone wolf out there, on the fringe of our AO, we will consider him though. However, since we are a Constitutional Militia, we will go where our State asks us to go, IF our AO does not need us.
  9. Since we didn't know of your group when we went with Lightfoot model. We weren't selecting it because you did.
  10. I don't think it's unintended. Finally figured out, and found, the Light Foot website - http://lightfootmilitia.com/ . The site clearly states they took the unit designation from the AWRM site. Evidently the Light Foot Militia site is utilizing a bunch of the information from AWRM.
  11. Meaning the Lightfoot also uses it. So we are following the Lightfoot system. If it matches with yours it is unintended.
  12. Here ya go. www.awrm.net IIRC it was established shortly after 9/11, the earliest copyright they have for the site is 2001. I have been a member there since 2008. You might also want to check out their page dealing with 'National Militia Standards'; they are so well written and organized that many units adopted/adapted them for their own bylaws and standards. These were written in 2003, but there are updates. http://www.awrm.net/nms.htm
  13. What is the “A well regulated militia” network? How is it found?
  14. Umm.. no it's not. 34FF (Field Force) is a designation for the State of Kansas. Each State was assigned a number based on what number they were when they became a state. Field Forces are further broken down into Battalions which are the various counties within that state. The Battalion number is assigned based on the county number assignedby that State. The company designation is based on who organized first within a county. My little group is A Co simply because we were the 1st to organize. The FFs are also grouped into Corps along geographical areas of the country. This organization system was created in 2006 and, as far as I know, accepted across the board by the various members/units within the 'A Well Regulated Militia' network, perhaps one of the oldest and largest militia networks in the country. Forgot to mention... The organization system was developed by a gentleman in the early '00s, around '02/'03, who use to operate a militia recruiting site. It was know as the 'CMNS' - Chronological Militia Naming System.
  15. Yes. Lightfoot. As i said lightfoot not mymilitia or any other site. I mean the lightfoot site as mymilitia didnt create the lightfoot.
  16. You do realize there are lightfoot units across the country and there are several within other milita sites that are not members of MM.
  17. No, i mean in general lightfoot units should be in contact with lightfoot units, the organisers who write and update the manuals and website. I am not trying to dictate how your unit operates, simply pointing out how organisation works most effectively.
  18. I'm assuming you're just referring to those in Kansas and members of the MM site and KAP?
  19. People who use lightfoot should be in contact with the lightfoot
  20. I found him through FB. No one said you should, nor said you shouldnt be cautious. I am happy to help get your battalion recognised so you dont have to contact them. You dont have to stand up a full recognised lightfoot battalion. I am sure there are hundreds. I just see it as if one claims the name they should also be in contact with the other units and indeed the people who created and update how the lightfoot operate. That is a unit decision though.
  21. We don't use FB, especially when one considers how nosey they are and how much they track your personal business. So... are you telling me that the FB Lightfoot group are the ones who decided who the brigade CO is? In all honesty... why should I check in with him?
  22. https://www.facebook.com/LightFootMilitia/ I could be wrong in my understanding of brigade structure, but i believe he is the brigade CO, at the very least he is the one updating manuals and the website.

  • Create New...