coffeebear

You're too busy trying to impress people with... whatever abilities you claim to have. You've offered absolutely zero constructive data, as far as I can tell, but you have so, so many claims of having been "shown the truth" - or some variation on this concept. You're lying, you're full of shit, and you're more interested in your own glory than in people actually understanding anything remotely approaching the concept of Christianity. Congratulations, you're another fucking worthless narcissist. Mods/Admins: If you want to chastise me for my statements here, just fucking ban me.

I don't believe there's a legitimate reason for incoherent, demented religious propaganda, either. This isn't a church, militias are not manned only by Christians, and this level of insanity is going to drive away people who are more level-headed, intelligent, and focused on the task at hand - which isn't hairbrained theological conspiracy theories. Given my own feelings on the matter, I'd say it's probably driving away the more serious Christians, as well.

I honestly can't tell if this one's a troll, or if he actually does enough drugs to believe this stuff...

I hope you're planning on recording that... would be very curious to see all the people that show up, and to hear what they have to say. That's not what you said. You said you guys were the ones planning to have people organizing rallies. You're disorganized, you haven't communicated, and here it is, a month out, and nobody knows what's supposed to be going on. Bold move, going with the "flash mob" approach.

You're a month out from a supposed American Revolutionary Congress 2.0 and nationwide rallies the day following... ... and you're intentionally not telling anybody yet? Good luck with that. ========== I really try to be respectful, but it's poor planning like this - and being proud of it - that leads me to believe that America has already lost - its corpse just hasn't reached room temperature yet.

If anybody here wonders why nobody takes us seriously? It's because of shit like this.

For those curious. This means that an elected official acting against the United States, in violation of their oath of office, and with intent to deprive citizens of their rights, is an enemy - according to their own definition. Incidentally, it would make people like George Soros an "enemy" as well - and since the definition includes corporations, let's not forget to include Google, Facebook, and Twitter. Yes, BLM is a legal entity (501c3), but at this point, the term "useful idiots" applies more to them, I believe. The overwhelming push to remain devoutly loyal to a

Son, if you think I've ever voted for a Democrat, you're not listening to what I've said.

Generalization. I don't intend to make a list of every person on this site and rate them on how beholden they are to their particular state government and how much fealty they have towards the federal government. See the recommended authors that you included when you quoted me. I also stated that I don't feel I could rely on most people here - so what would you have me do instead? Roll in solo? I'm not Rambo, and this isn't a movie. The usual hierarchy is God, family, country, yes? Again, I'm unable to restore the country by myself, and it would

The country and the Constitution are arbitrary creations with no significance other than what people give them. The underlying foundation of both is the more valuable knowledge. I'd recommend reading some Thomas Paine, some Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbs, John Locke... don't rest your laurels on the conclusions the Founding Fathers established... seek to understand what they understood in terms of rights, privileges, freedoms, and entitlements. Why does the Constitution hold such high regard with any who call themselves "patriot"? I'm fairly confident saying that an anorex

I've been quiet for a few days.. a lot on my plate as we prep to move out of a shitty blue state (WA), but.... The notion that one's right to resist an evil dictatorship stops at a state boundary? The notion that a corrupt federal government will some day call on you people to resist - with force - a corrupt government? The notion that you have to wait for King George III's permission to rebel against his tyranny? The groups formed on this website are impotent by definition. I see I was correct in not throwing my hat in with you lot... when SHTF, you'll find me in a log or ston

Who was our enemy in Vietnam? If you think it was the Vietnamese, you're wrong. Who was Russia's enemy in Afghanistan? If you said the Afghanis, you're wrong. Who is our enemy in the current riots and NFAC/BLM marches, etc.? If you said the people rioting and marching, you're wrong.

We like to think the "true patriots" in the military will refuse to obey orders to impose tyranny on the masses, but that's likely not the case. Not because they're traitors, or because they're evil, or anything of the sort. Rather, it's basic human psychology to obey authority - even when the acts they are performing go against their morals. Moreover, you've heard the adage that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely, but few realize how horrifyingly true this statement is. Much like the patriots who fought the British 250 years ago, I expect we could count on t

So that's how they're going to take care of servicemembers who'd actually fight for their country against a tyrannical government...

As much as I agree with the notion of "don't punish the innocent," I think it's worth remembering that not everyone in Georgia favored secession. Sherman's approach, though brutal, was effective, both through crippling Confederate supply lines, and in breaking the morale of the enemy. It's also worth remembering that Lincoln wanted amnesty and forgiveness to get the Union back on track as a single nation, though these plans were sidelined by his assassination, but that's another story for another time. For the moment, it's important that we realize antifa is conducting their own

Not sure if you guys saw this yet. No clue what kind of trained numbers you guys could put up, but it'd be an interesting opportunity.

Might want to look back a little further in history.

I never said don't think about the future. Let me spell it out for you.... I'm not dumping resources, time, energy, or effort into a specific candidate that may not be viable in 4 years. Yes, thinking long term, generally, is important. Thinking long term with specific individuals in mind, with as fleeting as life can be, is pointless. Aside from the malice of others, accidents can and do happen. Health issues can pop up out of absolutely nowhere, as anyone who knows who Grant Imahara was can attest.

I'll worry about 2024 when it gets here... this poll assumes America still exists in 4 years. As for the "What if Biden?" question... if he does win, then after his second year, I predict a "health issue" will befall the poor man, and his VP will then be able to not only carry the next 2 years of that term, but run for election in 2024, and possible reelection in 2028. Individuals are limited to ten years as president... not two terms.

I hadn't considered that angle, but if that's the case, I wonder how BLM still has their non-profit status. Oh wait, that's right... the sitting government is the enemy of the people. I suppose I should have been more general, rather than identifying a 501c3 specifically. I believe my point still stands... a militia that wants funding needs to have some way for people to channel funds to it.

This is the "scrap of paper" I was talking about. Re: funding? This is why I suggested that militias in a state work together to form a 501c3 Nonprofit Organization (hey, there's that word again) and start collecting donations through them to get some funding. With funding, they'd be able to rent a charter bus or whatever, buy food, and head out to the next Stone Mountain. The problem isn't a lack of a scrap of paper with "a plan" on it... it's funding... because again, how many of you are independently wealthy and can afford to take a weekend trip out to wherever? A whole week?

My point is the left has planners and strategists, the boots on the ground rioting and destroying aren't the planners, they're puppets. Be. Specific. Because at present, it sounds like you just want a scrap of paper with "Timmy says he can do this" and "Becky says she can do that". And that's all well and good if people are 100% honest and totally unbiased in their own reviews of their own abilities, and are so skilled as to be beyond the capacity for improvement that could be obtained by training with and conversing with others. Hint: Nobody is so spe

What do you mean by "be more organized"? Be specific... I'm trying to understand your point before I respond. Look at their success in organizing protests and riots. Look at their success at manipulating public opinion. Look at their success at getting their candidates elected, and enacting legislation favorable to their goals. To dismiss them like this is to underestimate them to the point where they have already won the fight. To assume we're superior, just because we think our cause is just, or because we think christians will always prevail because God, or becaus