Jump to content

Chops

Members
  • Content Count

    102
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

3 Followers

About Chops

VIP
Militia Leader
Members
  • Rank
    N.O.W.M Legion 2 (Leader)
  • Birthday 07/14/1980
  • Location Dry Ridge, KY, USA

Converted

  • Occupation
    Affiliate
  • About
    Armour Of God supports our constitution and we will not submit ourselves subject to having our rights violated. Every member that joins AOG must know the constitution and live by it. It is required upon joining AOG that you know the constitution or learn
  • Gender
    male

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. No arguing. When people for the same cause can not come to an understanding or an agreement. We need to follow what God said, for he is the head of us all. If 2 or more can not come to an agreement, then take the problem to a saint and let him decide the outcome and settle it and all must follow, respect, and honor it rather it is liked or not.
  2. If there are any members in the Northern Ky Area, Please comment on this post. I would like to know who is around the area. Any member needing a group within 50 miles of my location, reply as well. There is a plan I would like for all members in N.O.W Legion 2 to join in to help fund our group and get set up. We are all one here and should equally contribute to our cause. Thanks

  3. Anyone in Northern Kentucky within a 50 mile radius of Dry Ridge looking to form a group drop me a message. This includes experienced members. We need people to train. More the better. No time to waste. Also, I have found est 40 acres of land for sale, if members in the area can find some funds by donations or gov grants, we can buy it for training and residence when SHTF. It is key and perfect. Country side with a lot of green umbrellas and open ranges. one way in, one way out by vehicle. almost a 1/4 mile drive privately owned. Easy peek-a-boo to see whos coming before they hit the road.

  4. well said. Due to recent first amendment audits ran on the KSP, they failed to uphold their oath to protect the constitution and failed to follow the Kentucky Law Enforcement policy. Went in front of the Judge and he too is corrupted. He failed to use his code of conduct and breached my rights multi times. Forging a legal document also known as " False declaration", that is a class c felony and up to 10 years in federal. I have sent petition and complaints to higher authority and they to have failed to look at it "Lawfully" and "constitutionally". The Government has gone Foxtrot, Uniform, Bravo, Alpha, Romeo. By my constitutional rights being violated and no crime was committed, and By still applying my constitutional rights, I refuse to pay the fine. If they Law enforcement comes to arrest me, promise I will protect my freedom and the war will start here. Im in grant county
  5. Kentucky social workers are failing to have courts properly scrutinize and approve the drastic step of taking some children from their homes, relying instead on blank removal orders with pre-signed judges’ signatures, which is illegal according to several attorneys and judges. The allegations, which involve cases of purported parental abuse or neglect, have prompted numerous complaints to judges and state officials. They revolve specifically around the state Cabinet for Health and Family Services workers using pre-signed emergency custody court orders to remove children on weekends and after the courthouse has closed for the day. “The system that is currently set up allows for the social workers to call an on-call judge on the phone and then fill out the order themselves, a blank order with a judge’s signature on it,” attorney Karen Faulkner said in an interview. “Children are being illegally taken from their home without judges’ proper authority.” In some cases, attorneys and some judges claim cabinet workers have used blank copies of the pre-signed child removal orders to take kids from their parents, only later filling in the allegations and other items on the order. The judges and attorneys for the parents don’t see the orders until a hearing three days after the child has been removed. At least one local district judge, Julie Kaelin, said she has refused to follow the practice, saying it is violating the law. “Police officers can’t sign their own search warrants; they can’t create their own search warrants,” said attorney Sarah Clay, who is appointed to represent parents in abuse and neglect cases. “A judge has to approve it. And a judge reads the affidavit and reads the search warrant before they sign it.”
  6. First amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACLU: KNOW YOUR RIGHTS: WHAT TO DO IF YOU ARE DETAINED FOR TAKING PHOTOGRAPHS Taking photographs and video of things that are plainly visible in public spaces is a constitutional right—and that includes police and other government officials carrying out their duties. However, there is a widespread, continuing pattern of law enforcement officers ordering people to stop taking photographs or video in public places and harassing, detaining, and arresting those who fail to comply. The right of citizens to record the police is a critical check and balance. It creates an independent record of what took place in a particular incident, free from accusations of bias, lying, or faulty memory. It is no accident that some of the most high-profile cases of police misconduct have involved video and audio records. The ACLU has fought—and will keep fighting—to ensure that the right to film and photograph the police is respected by law enforcement officials. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kentucky Law Enforcement Policy: Policy # VIDEO RECORDING AND PHOTOGRAPHING OF POLICE OFFICERS Related Policies: This policy is for internal use only and does not enlarge an employee’s civil liability in any way. The policy should not be construed as creating a higher duty of care, in an evidentiary sense, with respect to third party civil claims against employees. A violation of this policy, if proven, can only form the basis of a complaint by this department for non-judicial administrative action in accordance with the laws governing employee discipline. Applicable State Statutes: KACP Standard: 17.12 Date Implemented: Review Date: 1/9/2017 – SRW I. Purpose: Individuals have a First Amendment right to record sheriff’s deputies / police officers in the public discharge of their duties. The right to record is not limited to streets and sidewalks -- it includes areas where individuals have a legal right to be present, including an individual's home or business, or other private property where the person has a right to be present. II. Procedure: A. Members of the press and members of the general public enjoy the same rights in any area accessible to the general public. No individual is required to have or to display 'press credentials' in order to exercise his/her right to observe, photograph, or record police activity taking place in an area accessible to, or within view of, the general public. B. In situations where members of the public are photographing or recording a police action, officers must not search or seize a camera or recording device (including cell phones) without a warrant, except under very limited circumstances as described herein. C. Officers are prohibited from threatening, intimidating or otherwise discouraging any individual from photographing or recording police activities. D. Officers must not intentionally block or obstruct cameras or recording devices in any manner. E. Officers are prohibited from deleting recordings or photographs, and from damaging or destroying recording devices/cameras under any circumstances. F. A person may record/photograph public police activity unless the person engages in actions that jeopardize the safety of the officer, the suspect, or others in the vicinity, violate the law, or incite others to violate the law. Examples of such actions include but are not limited to: a. Physically interfering with the police officer’s official duties. (Interviews with suspects and witnesses/gathering evidence). b. Hindering a lawful arrest; c. Inciting bystanders to hinder or obstruct an officer in the performance of their duties. Conduct taken alone which would be insufficient to meet hindering or obstructing would include, but not be limited to: i. An individual's recording/photographing of police activity from a safe distance without any attendant action intended to obstruct the activity or threaten the safety of others does not amount to interference. ii. A person's expression of criticism of the police (or the police activity being observed) does not amount to interference. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that a properly trained officer may reasonably be expected to exercise a higher degree of restraint' than the average citizen when it comes to reacting to insults or 'fighting words.' Courts have given First Amendment protection to persons who made obscene gestures and yelled profanities at police officers, and they have prohibited the police from interfering with such speech. G. The warrantless seizure of material protected by the First Amendment (photos, videos, etc.) will be strictly scrutinized by a court. In ordinary circumstances, the seizure of cameras or recording devices without a warrant will not be reasonable. Cameras or recording devices will not be seized without a warrant unless: a. Officers have probable cause to believe that critical evidence of a felony crime is contained on/in the camera or recording device; and b. Officers first have explained the circumstances to the person in the possession of the recording device; c. The seizure of the camera/recording device is for no longer than reasonably necessary for the officer, acting with diligence, to obtain a search warrant to seize the evidence (OPTION: and the local prosecutor is notified of the seizure for consultation/direction to secure a search warrant); and d. Supervisory approval has been granted for the seizure. (Optional Provision) e. If a camera/recording device is seized without a search warrant pursuant to Section c. above, officers are prohibited from seizing or viewing the evidence contained in the device until a warrant is obtained for that seizure. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Judicial Code of Conduct: Canon 1 COMMENTARY Deference to the judgments and rulings of courts depends on public confidence in the integrity and independence of judges. The integrity and independence of judges depend in turn on their acting without fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they must comply with the law and should comply with this Code. Adherence to this responsibility helps to maintain public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary. Conversely, violation of this Code diminishes public confidence in the judiciary and injures our system of government under law. The Canons are rules of reason. They should be applied consistently with constitutional requirements, statutes, other court rules and decisional law, and in the context of all relevant circumstances. The Code is to be construed so it does not impinge on the essential independence of judges in making judicial decisions. -Impinge: The same as abridge, infringe, trespass, etc. -Constitutional requirements ( no law can be put before a constitutional right of the people unless by due process of law, nor can a constitutional right be turned into a crime. Even thru the court process, you still have rights. There are 2 different types of due process. Such as this case here, I had freedom of speech. The other type of due process is a capital crime, such as murder etc, this is when your Miranda rights would be read and your freedom of speech goes out the window, but you do still have the right to remain silent. If a capital crime was committed and your Miranda rights were not read during your arrest. By law, the case is dismissed and you would be free to go. ) -Statute: Is a law -Other court rules: other rules of different courts that the judge must follow. Even if one court don't have a rule as another, it is to still be applied. -Decisional Law: Court rulings from other courts in the jurisdiction, or by higher court rulings such as the supreme courts. Also known as "Case Law". Canon 3-A4: A judge should accord to every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding, and that person’s lawyer, the full right to be heard according to law. My freedom of speech was abridged during the hearing. Proof of corruption in Grant County Kentucky.
  7. I had Filed a civil rule about this unconstitutional ruling by a corrupted judge. When I had went to court. I had shown the Judge proof that my actions were legal by providing the Kentucky Law enforcement policy showing the Trooper's misconduct, I had provided the supreme court rulings showing my actions were made legal, and I had also provided evidence that the Troopers had lied under oath during the preliminary hearing. I had also provided evidence that the Judge was not following his rules of conduct. I had also shown the Judge that the Judgement Order was a false document/ false declaration. The Judge had admitted he had falsified this document and the Judge had still over ruled this Civil Rule. He knowingly did this. There is proof that this is also a conflict of interest between the Judge and the county attorney. Also favoritism towards the Troopers. I have had tried to file a complaint against the judge with the Judicial Conduct Commission and the JCC failed to comply or attempt to look into this tyranny twice. I have had also sent a complaint against the Troopers to Internal affairs and they failed to comply with investigating this tyranny. I have had mailed the House of Rep (Kentucky Governor Matt Bevins) about this also. It has been over 2 months and I still have not heard word about this. If no action will be taken into consideration and things be corrected, then Kentucky will be in considered an un-free state. I refuse to pay this fine set. If the police come to arrest me, the war will start here. I will not bow down to tyrants, nor will i pay a fine for conducting a constitutional protected activity. The longer we wait to do something about this tyranny, the worse it will get and other citizen's rights are being violated by oppressive authority. The only way to show that we mean business and are willing to support our rights, that is to take action and meet them face to face and let them know they are not above "We the People". It is not going to get any better unless we do something about it. Location: Grant County, Kentucky
  8. No lawyer, I rep myself. Once I get this appealed, I'm going to file a complaint and send it to the 6th circuit and also send a letter to the govenor to have him impeached. There are around 8- 10 misconduct and fraudulent activities that can be proven against the Judge. Including either a class C or D felonies that will make him serve up to 5-10 years in federal prison. When I went to the civil rule, I prayed to God not to let the Judge lie but to speak truth. When the Judge admitted to falsifying a court document and making a false declaration on that document, He noticed what he had said after he said it Because his body language and his tone changed. The county attorney which is a good friend to the Judge got upset because of what I was able to get the Judge to admit. The county attorney became disorderly and the Judge did not say or do anything to the county attorney about it. The bailiff walked up to the county attorney and looked at me like he was waiting on me to say something about it. It looks even worse on the Judge to overrule this after informing him the trooper lied under oath. The county attorney is the son of the circuit judge and the circuit judge is a friend to the district judge. By the events that took place, it can be provable this is a conflict of interest and conspiracy. Therefore proving this case was staged to find me guilty without any evidence to back up the false declaration of me being guilty. There are many case laws of this same scenario that have been appealed. The judge failed at his oath and the code of conduct.. A judge must be diligent in his working of cases. He wasn't , if he were, he would have had found the trooper's lie which entitles a new trial or a dismissal of the case all together because it messes with the proper ruling. The judge showed favoritism that is also provable. This goes against his code of conduct as well. This judge is corrupt and needs to be removed.
  9. I had decided to give the district judge "Thomas M. Funk" another chance to retract his unconstitutional ruling by filing a civil rule. I had pointed out to the Judge the State trooper had gone against his policy, constitutional rights, and supreme court ruling and had also committed perjury in his testimony in the preliminary hearing. The Judge did not care to hear this and stated he was not going to change his ruling. I had also gave notice to the Judge that he had falsified a judgement and order document by stating I advised I was intentionally trying to agitate police. I had told the Judge that I did not say such things. The Judge admitted he, himself said this which is a confession that he, himself willingly falsified a document. The Judge had over ruled the civil rule. This is tyranny at it's best. The Judge don't follow canon 1 which states judges are to use constitutional requirements, statutes, other court rules, and desisional law (case law). The code of conduct also states the Judges are to give people the FULL right to be heard. Tho there are rules in a court room, these rules are allowed to be made by the administration thru the administrative procedure act Which is a statute. Since no law can be made or in force unless by due process of law, nor can a law be put before a constitutional law, the rules are not valid until due process (the final judgement). It seems the district judges abuse their authority and make up their own laws and by their own conclusions outside of the constitutional rights of we the people and outside the laws that are put into place. The judge disregarded his oath and his duties. He must be removed. And I would like to ask if anyone can donate to have this case appealed and help prepare a petition to have this judge impeached. I have approximately 20 days left to have this unconstitutional ruling appealed. If you are willing to donate or know others whom are willing. Please send a message to me and details will be given. Thanks
  10. The dictator Obama funded ( including "Sunni tribes" = ISIS.
  11. https://thirdrailtalk.com/evidence-of-ilhan-omar-citizenship-fraud/ Mis-informed or bad source. Tho there are a lot of other biolographs with different D.O.B's for Ilhan Omar. Some say 1981 while others say 1982. It is well over one which state both. Either way, the act was not established until 2001. I do find it interesting that she is from Kenya, samolia, and Palistine. Kind odd. Kenya is the same place Obumer is from. It has been rumoured that Obama was in trade deals with Kenya by selling/trading weapons there. I mean, that Infiltrator did fund ISIL ( AKA: ISIS). He admitted that on national television. ISIS and ISIL are the same people. They just split off into two groups when Muhammad didn't leave a predecessor to either one of his 2 sons. They warred against each other for predecessor rights. Both sides are radical. This is factual research from studying from a biblical stand point. Obama did try to go a third term. He did nothing for this country but tare it down. Now he has his same people In our Congress. I have noticed that everything that is being done has been carefully planned and these things are slowly coming into play and set up. In fact, if one can not see it, it will never be known until it is too late. Very sneakily.
  12. I have found the "administrative procedure act". Which allows rule and regulation making. This is the statute. To see that the 49 regulations as a restriction against constitutional law "the right to travel". The supreme court's have already ruled it is a right even in the course of business. Trucking is in the course of business. There are many case laws by the supreme court's stating this. The cfr 49 is in violation against the constitutional law (freedom of movement in section 329, page 1135. This regulation is invalid and fraudulent. The right to travel can not be hindered. CDLs, D.O.T physicals "med Cards" ( possibly more) are a hindrance, which restricts the right to the people to travel/drive while conducting business which has already been ruled by the supreme court's. No agency can make a law under the APA or over rule such rulings by the supreme court's and tho Congress make laws, No law can contradict the rights to the people. Such laws are considered a breach of liberty (freedom) and the laws/regulations are found in violation and fraudulent. The (APA) also stated these rules and regulations shall not infringe on the constitutional rights/laws. But the CFR 49 does infringe. Even more so than just the right to travel. It also contradicts the 4th amendment, the 14th amendment, the 1st amendment, possibly more. And automobile and a motor vehicle are foreseen as the same thing. One is much bigger than the other. Both are propelled by a driveshaft, but in actual mechanical terms, a drive shaft is called a propeller shaft. Therefore both automobile and motor vehicle are propelled by a shaft, and gears and mechanics. To see that the CFR 49 Regulations are in violation of breaching the APA statute and constitutional law. The CFR 49 shall be forfeited and revised to better compliance of the APA which states can not infringe or breach the constitution rights/laws. Here are supreme court rulings (case laws). U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 1 1 U.S. SUPREME COURT AND OTHER HIGH COURT CITATIONS PROVING THAT NO LICENSE IS NECESSARY FOR NORMAL USE OF AN AUTOMOBILE ON COMMON WAYS "The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse- drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another's rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct." Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135 "The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business." -Thompson vs. Smith, supra.; Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784 "… the right of the citizen to drive on a public street with freedom from police interference… is a fundamental constitutional right" -White, 97 Cal.App.3d.141, 158 Cal.Rptr. 562, 566-67 (1979) “citizens have a right to drive upon the public streets of the District of Columbia or any other city absent a constitutionally sound reason for limiting their access.” Caneisha Mills v. D.C. 2009 “The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees. . .” Berberian v. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869, 872, See also: Schecter v. Killingsworth, 380 P.2d 136, 140; 93 Ariz. 273 (1963). “The right to operate a motor vehicle [an automobile] upon the public streets and highways is not a mere privilege. It is a right of liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of the federal and state constitutions.” Adams v. City of Pocatello, 416 P.2d 46, 48; 91 Idaho 99 (1966). “A traveler has an equal right to employ an automobile as a means of transportation and to occupy the public highways with other vehicles in common use.” Campbell v. Walker, 78 Atl. 601, 603, 2 Boyce (Del.) 41. “The owner of an automobile has the same right as the owner of other vehicles to use the highway,* * * A traveler on foot has the same right to the use of the public highways as an automobile or any other vehicle.” Simeone v. Lindsay, 65 Atl. 778, 779; Hannigan v. Wright, 63 Atl. 234, 236. "The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts." People v. Horton 14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971) “The right to make use of an automobile as a vehicle of travel long the highways of the state, is no longer an open question. The owners thereof have the same rights in the roads and streets as the drivers of horses or those riding a bicycle or traveling in some other vehicle.” House v. Cramer, 112 N.W. 3; 134 Iowa 374; Farnsworth v. Tampa Electric Co. 57 So. 233, 237, 62 Fla. 166. “The automobile may be used with safety to others users of the highway, and in its proper use upon the highways there is an equal right with the users of other vehicles properly upon the highways. The law recognizes such right of use upon general principles. Brinkman v Pacholike, 84 N.E. 762, 764, 41 Ind. App. 662, 666. “The law does not denounce motor carriages, as such, on public ways. They have an equal right with other vehicles in common use to occupy the streets and roads. It is improper to say that the driver of the horse has rights in the roads superior to the driver of the automobile. Both have the right to use the easement.” Indiana Springs Co. v. Brown, 165 Ind. 465, 468.
  13. That's infringing. Hell no. I do not comply. If they want my gun. Come get it!
  14. A man canst not save a man, fore in man I trust not. In the one I trust is with me and me with he. It has been said, kill and be killed, take no vengeance upon thy self fore vengeance belongth to the Lord and he will repay. Heed this warning, when America causes the government to flee southward. We shalt speak " peace and safety", when this be said, sudden destruction shall come. Once America creates the civil war, the world shall see it and hear of it. Nation shall rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom. From the utter kaos that shalt be set forth like a chain reaction world wide, one shall ascend and say, " I am the Lord thy God", he shall set peace between Israel and Palestine and stand in the 3rd temple speaking great wonders and working miracles in the sight of man. The whole world will marvel and follow him. He is the adversary and the creator of deception. This man follow not, But war against him. The dragon will give him power to over take and cause a falling away. After peace is set between Israel and palistine with a 7 year peace agreement. He shall breach it within 3.5 years and make war. Gog and magog. Then tribulation shall begin. The dragon revelation 12:3 kjv speaks of is and was the bright and morning star that will be cast to the earth where hell and evil will be cast into. I prophesy the things and have seen from the time of the Damascus being taken out of the way and left a ruinous heap to the end in dreams and visions accompanied by the Holy Spirit. Our Sun is the pillar of St. Michael the Arch angel, he whom bound Satan in heaven likewise his pillar too. Satan's pillar is the dragon. (Binary star system). There will be a morning at Sun rise Ye shall see the dragon rise first posing as our Sun, the 1-3 hours after, our Sun will rise. As our Sun rises, the posing Sun will dim and the face of the dragon shall be seen. He will turn to the earth and his eyes shall get big and wide with great delight, but his mind set is to devour. He will open his mouth and start moving towards the earth. All will see this and with such great wonders in heaven, the hearts of men will fail them from the fearful sights. No man has ever seen these things before. The war that is to come and yet is nigh, is not of shields and buckles and armor of men, but spiritually.

Follow: @My_Militia

Mission Statement

As the de facto authority in american patriot militias we understand that we oversee a significant share of the publics perception of the militia, and with this many individuals and militias entrust their ideas, work, and data to our platform. We do not take this lightly as we mandate an extreme amount of responsibility and assurance of good faith, transparency, and due process. We will remain vigilant as a trusted force among our people. So help us God.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Your Privacy Is Important To Us Learn More: Privacy Policy